Radeon HD 4770 vs Radeon HD 6670/7670

AMD

Radeon HD 4770

2009Core: 750 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 6670/7670

2012Core: 600 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon HD 4770 vs Radeon HD 6670/7670 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 4770 vs Radeon HD 6670/7670 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 4770 vs Radeon HD 6670/7670: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 4770

2009

Why buy it

  • 8.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • 2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 10.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $109 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.3 vs 9.6 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
  • 77.8% higher power demand at 80W vs 45W.

Radeon HD 6670/7670

2012

Why buy it

  • Costs $10 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
  • Delivers 14.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.6 vs 8.3 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
  • Draws 45W instead of 80W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 4770 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 4770 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 8.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon HD 6670/7670 instead at 946 vs 909, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon HD 4770 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 6670/7670 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $10 cheaper on MSRP at $99 vs $109, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 14.6% (9.6 vs 8.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6670/7670 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon HD 4770 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon HD 4770 vs Radeon HD 6670/7670 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon HD 4770

The Radeon HD 4770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 28 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 909 points. Launch price was $109.

AMD

Radeon HD 6670/7670

The Radeon HD 6670/7670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 5 2012. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 946 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 4770 scores 909 and the Radeon HD 6670/7670 reaches 946 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 4770 is built on TeraScale while the Radeon HD 6670/7670 uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 640 (Radeon HD 4770) vs 480 (Radeon HD 6670/7670). Raw compute: 0.96 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4770) vs 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6670/7670).

FeatureRadeon HD 4770Radeon HD 6670/7670
G3D Mark Score
909
946+4%
Architecture
TeraScale
TeraScale 2
Process Node
40 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
640+33%
480
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.96 TFLOPS+67%
0.576 TFLOPS
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
32+33%
24
L1 Cache
128 KB+167%
48 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
256 KB+100%
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 4770Radeon HD 6670/7670
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon HD 4770 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6670/7670. L2 Cache: 128 KB (Radeon HD 4770) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 6670/7670) — the Radeon HD 6670/7670 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 4770Radeon HD 6670/7670
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
128 KB
256 KB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 4770 draws 80W versus the Radeon HD 6670/7670's 45W — a 56% difference. The Radeon HD 6670/7670 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (Radeon HD 4770) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6670/7670). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureRadeon HD 4770Radeon HD 6670/7670
TDP
80W
45W-44%
Recommended PSU
400W
350W-13%
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
1x 6-pin
Length
203mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
72°C
Perf/Watt
11.4
21.0+84%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 4770 came in at $109, while the Radeon HD 6670/7670 launched at $99. On MSRP, Radeon HD 6670/7670 was 9.2% cheaper ($10 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.3 (Radeon HD 4770) vs 9.6 (Radeon HD 6670/7670) — the Radeon HD 6670/7670 offers 15.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 6670/7670 (2012 vs 2009).

FeatureRadeon HD 4770Radeon HD 6670/7670
MSRP
$109
$99-9%
Performance per Dollar
8.3
9.6+16%
Codename
RV740
Turks
Release
April 28 2009
January 5 2012
Ranking
#908
#870

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.