Radeon R7 240 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R7 240 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R7 240 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R7 240

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($69 MSRP vs $139 MSRP).
✅Delivers 97.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.1 vs 6.6 G3D/$ ($69 MSRP vs $139 MSRP).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 30W instead of 300W, a 270W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

2025

Why buy it

✅135.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌
101.4% HIGHER MSRP
$139 MSRPvs$69 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.6 vs 13.1 G3D/$ ($139 MSRP vs $69 MSRP).
❌900% higher power demand at 300W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 135.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.1% in PassMark G3D (921 vs 902), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 4nm process instead of 28nm, 64 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2013. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 240 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $70 cheaper on MSRP at $69 vs $139, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 97.3% (13.1 vs 6.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 240 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon R7 240 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R7 240

The Radeon R7 240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 780 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 902 points. Launch price was $69.

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the Bristol Ridge architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 921 points. Launch price was $1,299.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 240 scores 902 and the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E reaches 921 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 240 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E uses Bristol Ridge, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 320 (Radeon R7 240) vs 4,096 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E). Raw compute: 0.448 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 240) vs 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E). Boost clocks: 780 MHz vs 2920 MHz.

Feature	Radeon R7 240	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
G3D Mark Score	902	921+2%
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Bristol Ridge
Process Node	28 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	320	4096+1180%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.448 TFLOPS	47.84 TFLOPS+10579%
Boost Clock	780 MHz	2920 MHz+274%
ROPs	8	128+1500%
TMUs	20	256+1180%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	8 MB+3100%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R7 240	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R7 240 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E carries 512 MB. Radeon R7 240 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R7 240 and System on the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 240) vs 8 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E) — the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon R7 240	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+300%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	System
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	8 MB+3100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 240 draws 30W versus the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E's 300W — a 163.6% difference. The Radeon R7 240 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon R7 240) vs 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon R7 240	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
TDP	30W-90%	300W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	30.1+871%	3.1

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R7 240 came in at $69, while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E launched at $139. On MSRP, Radeon R7 240 was 50.4% cheaper ($70 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 13.1 (Radeon R7 240) vs 6.6 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E) — the Radeon R7 240 offers 98.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E (2025 vs 2013).

Feature	Radeon R7 240	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
MSRP	$69-50%	$139
Performance per Dollar	13.1+98%	6.6
Codename	Oland	Navi 48
Release	October 8 2013	July 23 2025
Ranking	#911	#23

Search Radeon R7 240 on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.