Radeon R7 240
VS
GRID P40-6Q

Radeon R7 240 vs GRID P40-6Q

AMD

Radeon R7 240

2013Boost: 780 MHz
VS

GRID P40-6Q

2013Core: 745 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 240 is positioned at rank 103 and the GRID P40-6Q is on rank 396, so the Radeon R7 240 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 240

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
555%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
533%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
527%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
526%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
525%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
522%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
515%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
514%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
509%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
507%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
501%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
500%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
491%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
491%
#82
Intel UHD Graphics P750
MSRP: $150|Avg: $100
94%
#83
Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G
MSRP: $299|Avg: $100
93%
#88
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
612%
#103
Radeon R7 240
MSRP: $69|Avg: $15
100%
#104
Radeon R7 G
MSRP: $69|Avg: $51
96%
#107
GeForce GT 640
MSRP: $99|Avg: $50
90%
#108
Radeon R7 250
MSRP: $89|Avg: $25
90%
#109
GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
90%
#111
Radeon HD 8550D
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
87%
#112
Radeon 520
MSRP: $78|Avg: $78
86%
#113
Radeon HD 4810
MSRP: $70|Avg: $15
85%
#115
GeForce 605
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
84%
#116
Radeon HD 8410G
MSRP: $40|Avg: $5
83%
#117
RADEON HD6530D
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
81%
#118
Moore Threads MTT S30
MSRP: $55|Avg: $55
81%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GRID P40-6Q

#381
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
49243%
#396
GRID P40-6Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
100%
#397
Quadro FX 540
MSRP: $299|Avg: $15
90%
#398
Tesla M2070-Q
MSRP: $5489|Avg: $50
80%
#399
Quadro 7000
MSRP: $14499|Avg: $300
80%
#400
Quadro FX 1500
MSRP: $699|Avg: $30
80%
#401
Quadro FX 3700
MSRP: $1599|Avg: $500
77%
#402
Quadro FX 4700 X2
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $15
77%
#403
GRID M10-0B
MSRP: $4000|Avg: $1000
73%
#405
GRID K340
MSRP: $3299|Avg: $57
67%
#406
Quadro FX 4600
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $50
67%
#407
Quadro FX 5600
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $50
60%
#409
Quadro FX 3500
MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1599
57%
#410
Quadro FX 1400
MSRP: $799|Avg: $30
53%
#411
GRID K1
MSRP: $4140|Avg: $120
53%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GRID P40-6Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R7 240 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon R7 240GRID P40-6Q
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%)
Leading raw performance (+0.3%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+300%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R7 240 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 240 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $150), it costs 90% less, resulting in a 896.7% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R7 240GRID P40-6Q
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+896.7%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($15)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 240 and GRID P40-6Q

AMD

Radeon R7 240

The Radeon R7 240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 780 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 902 points. Launch price was $69.

NVIDIA

GRID P40-6Q

The GRID P40-6Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 905 points. Launch price was $469.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 240 scores 902 and the GRID P40-6Q reaches 905 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 240 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GRID P40-6Q uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 320 (Radeon R7 240) vs 1,536 (GRID P40-6Q). Raw compute: 0.448 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 240) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID P40-6Q).

FeatureRadeon R7 240GRID P40-6Q
G3D Mark Score
902
905
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
320
1536+380%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.448 TFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS+411%
ROPs
8
32+300%
TMUs
20
128+540%
L1 Cache
80 KB
128 KB+60%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R7 240GRID P40-6Q
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R7 240 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GRID P40-6Q has 512 MB. The Radeon R7 240 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon R7 240) vs 512 KB (GRID P40-6Q) — the GRID P40-6Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R7 240GRID P40-6Q
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+300%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 240 draws 30W versus the GRID P40-6Q's 225W — a 152.9% difference. The Radeon R7 240 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon R7 240) vs 350W (GRID P40-6Q). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon R7 240GRID P40-6Q
TDP
30W-87%
225W
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
1mm
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
30.1+653%
4.0
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R7 240 launched at $69 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GRID P40-6Q launched at $3000 and now averages $150. The Radeon R7 240 costs 90% less ($135 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 60.1 (Radeon R7 240) vs 6.0 (GRID P40-6Q) — the Radeon R7 240 offers 901.7% better value.

FeatureRadeon R7 240GRID P40-6Q
MSRP
$69-98%
$3000
Avg Price (30d)
$15-90%
$150
Performance per Dollar
60.1+902%
6.0
Codename
Oland
GK104
Release
October 8 2013
June 28 2013
Ranking
#911
#628