Radeon R7 240
VS
GRID M6-0B

Radeon R7 240 vs GRID M6-0B

AMD

Radeon R7 240

2013Boost: 780 MHz
VS

GRID M6-0B

2015Core: 722 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 240 is positioned at rank 103 and the GRID M6-0B is on rank 374, so the Radeon R7 240 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 240

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
555%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
533%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
527%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
526%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
525%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
522%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
515%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
514%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
509%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
507%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
501%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
500%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
491%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
491%
#82
Intel UHD Graphics P750
MSRP: $150|Avg: $100
94%
#83
Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G
MSRP: $299|Avg: $100
93%
#88
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
612%
#103
Radeon R7 240
MSRP: $69|Avg: $15
100%
#104
Radeon R7 G
MSRP: $69|Avg: $51
96%
#107
Radeon R7 250
MSRP: $89|Avg: $25
90%
#108
GeForce GT 640
MSRP: $99|Avg: $50
90%
#109
GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
90%
#111
Radeon HD 8550D
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
87%
#112
Radeon 520
MSRP: $78|Avg: $78
86%
#113
Radeon HD 4810
MSRP: $70|Avg: $15
85%
#115
GeForce 605
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
84%
#116
Radeon HD 8410G
MSRP: $40|Avg: $5
83%
#117
RADEON HD6530D
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
81%
#118
Moore Threads MTT S30
MSRP: $55|Avg: $55
81%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GRID M6-0B

#358
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
24218%
#373
Quadro 6000
MSRP: $4399|Avg: $150
100%
#374
GRID M6-0B
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
100%
#375
RTXA5000-6Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2500
100%
#376
GRID M10-1B
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $150
98%
#377
Tesla K40c
MSRP: $7699|Avg: $500
95%
#378
Quadro FX 4800
MSRP: $1799|Avg: $80
92%
#379
Tesla M2090
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $40
92%
#380
GRID K180Q
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $1000
87%
#381
GRID K2
MSRP: $5199|Avg: $80
87%
#382
Quadro CX
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $500
77%
#383
GRID P100-8Q
MSRP: $7374|Avg: $550
72%
#384
Quadro FX 550
MSRP: $150|Avg: $10
70%
#385
Quadro FX 350
MSRP: $199|Avg: $15
70%
#386
Tesla M2070
MSRP: $3099|Avg: $50
69%
#387
GRID V100D-8Q
MSRP: $10000|Avg: $10000
69%
#388
GRID M10-0Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150
66%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GRID M6-0B is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R7 240 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon R7 240GRID M6-0B
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%)
Leading raw performance (+1.1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+300%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R7 240 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 240 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $100), it costs 85% less, resulting in a 559.4% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R7 240GRID M6-0B
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+559.4%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($15)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 240 and GRID M6-0B

AMD

Radeon R7 240

The Radeon R7 240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 780 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 902 points. Launch price was $69.

NVIDIA

GRID M6-0B

The GRID M6-0B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 912 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 240 scores 902 and the GRID M6-0B reaches 912 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 240 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GRID M6-0B uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 320 (Radeon R7 240) vs 1,536 (GRID M6-0B). Raw compute: 0.448 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 240) vs 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID M6-0B).

FeatureRadeon R7 240GRID M6-0B
G3D Mark Score
902
912+1%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
320
1536+380%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.448 TFLOPS
2.218 TFLOPS+395%
ROPs
8
64+700%
TMUs
20
96+380%
L1 Cache
80 KB
576 KB+620%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R7 240GRID M6-0B
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R7 240 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GRID M6-0B has 512 MB. The Radeon R7 240 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 240) vs 2 MB (GRID M6-0B) — the GRID M6-0B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R7 240GRID M6-0B
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+300%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 240 draws 30W versus the GRID M6-0B's 100W — a 107.7% difference. The Radeon R7 240 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon R7 240) vs 350W (GRID M6-0B). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon R7 240GRID M6-0B
TDP
30W-70%
100W
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
1mm
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
30.1+231%
9.1
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R7 240 launched at $69 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GRID M6-0B launched at $1500 and now averages $100. The Radeon R7 240 costs 85% less ($85 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 60.1 (Radeon R7 240) vs 9.1 (GRID M6-0B) — the Radeon R7 240 offers 560.4% better value. The GRID M6-0B is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).

FeatureRadeon R7 240GRID M6-0B
MSRP
$69-95%
$1500
Avg Price (30d)
$15-85%
$100
Performance per Dollar
60.1+560%
9.1
Codename
Oland
GM204
Release
October 8 2013
August 30 2015
Ranking
#911
#535