Radeon R7 240 vs Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual
Radeon R7 240
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 240 is positioned at rank 103 and the Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual is on rank 447, so the Radeon R7 240 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 240
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R7 240 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual.
| Insight | Radeon R7 240 | Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Legacy) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R7 240 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 240 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $150), it costs 90% less, resulting in a 920.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R7 240 | Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+920.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 240 and Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual
Radeon R7 240
The Radeon R7 240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 780 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 902 points. Launch price was $69.
Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual
The Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 1 2013. The core clock speed is 720 / 775 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 884 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 240 scores 902 and the Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual reaches 884 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 320 (Radeon R7 240) vs 768 (Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual).
| Feature | Radeon R7 240 | Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 902+2% | 884 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 320 | 768+140% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 240 | Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R7 240 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual has 512 MB. The Radeon R7 240 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R7 240 | Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 240 draws 30W versus the Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual's 50W — a 50% difference. The Radeon R7 240 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon R7 240) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon R7 240 | Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-40% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 30.1+70% | 17.7 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 240 launched at $69 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual launched at $150 and now averages $150. The Radeon R7 240 costs 90% less ($135 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 60.1 (Radeon R7 240) vs 5.9 (Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual) — the Radeon R7 240 offers 918.6% better value.
| Feature | Radeon R7 240 | Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $69-54% | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-90% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 60.1+919% | 5.9 |
| Codename | Oland | — |
| Release | October 8 2013 | August 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #911 | #881 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R7 240 and Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual
