Radeon R7 240 vs Radeon R5 430
Radeon R7 240
Popular choices:
Radeon R5 430
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 240 is positioned at rank 103 and the Radeon R5 430 is on rank 303, so the Radeon R7 240 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 240
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 430
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R7 240 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R5 430.
| Insight | Radeon R7 240 | Radeon R5 430 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R7 240 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 240 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $50), it costs 70% less, resulting in a 239.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R7 240 | Radeon R5 430 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+239.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 240 and Radeon R5 430
Radeon R7 240
The Radeon R7 240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 780 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 902 points. Launch price was $69.
Radeon R5 430
The Radeon R5 430 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 886 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 240 scores 902 and the Radeon R5 430 reaches 886 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 240 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R5 430 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 320 (Radeon R7 240) vs 320 (Radeon R5 430). Raw compute: 0.448 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 240) vs 0.6592 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 430). Boost clocks: 780 MHz vs 1030 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R7 240 | Radeon R5 430 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 902+2% | 886 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 320 | 320 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.448 TFLOPS | 0.6592 TFLOPS+47% |
| Boost Clock | 780 MHz | 1030 MHz+32% |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 20 | 20 |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 240 | Radeon R5 430 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R7 240 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 430 has 512 MB. The Radeon R7 240 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon R7 240) vs 128 KB (Radeon R5 430) — the Radeon R7 240 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R7 240 | Radeon R5 430 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 240 draws 30W versus the Radeon R5 430's 30W — a 0% difference. The Radeon R5 430 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon R7 240) vs 350W (Radeon R5 430). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R7 240 | Radeon R5 430 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W | 30W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 30.1+2% | 29.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 240 launched at $69 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Radeon R5 430 launched at $59 and now averages $50. The Radeon R7 240 costs 70% less ($35 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 60.1 (Radeon R7 240) vs 17.7 (Radeon R5 430) — the Radeon R7 240 offers 239.5% better value. The Radeon R5 430 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon R7 240 | Radeon R5 430 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $69 | $59-14% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-70% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 60.1+240% | 17.7 |
| Codename | Oland | Jet |
| Release | October 8 2013 | May 15 2016 |
| Ranking | #911 | #922 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R7 240 and Radeon R5 430
