Radeon R7 250 vs GeForce 920MX
Radeon R7 250
Popular choices:
GeForce 920MX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 250 is positioned at rank 107 and the GeForce 920MX is on rank 360, so the Radeon R7 250 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 250
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 920MX
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 920MX is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R7 250 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon R7 250 | GeForce 920MX |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R7 250 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 250 holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $54), it costs 54% less, resulting in a 113.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R7 250 | GeForce 920MX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+113.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($25) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($54) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 250 and GeForce 920MX
Radeon R7 250
The Radeon R7 250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,051 points. Launch price was $89.
GeForce 920MX
The GeForce 920MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,064 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 250 scores 1,051 and the GeForce 920MX reaches 1,064 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 250 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce 920MX uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R7 250) vs 256 (GeForce 920MX). Raw compute: 0.8064 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 250) vs 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce 920MX). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 993 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R7 250 | GeForce 920MX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,051 | 1,064+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+50% | 256 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8064 TFLOPS+59% | 0.5084 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1050 MHz+6% | 993 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 128 KB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 250 | GeForce 920MX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R7 250 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 920MX has 512 MB. The Radeon R7 250 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 250) vs 1 MB (GeForce 920MX) — the GeForce 920MX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R7 250 | GeForce 920MX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (Radeon R7 250) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce 920MX). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon R7 250 | GeForce 920MX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 | 12 (11_0)+8% |
| Vulkan | 1.2+9% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 250) vs None (GeForce 920MX). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 (Radeon R7 250) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 920MX).
| Feature | Radeon R7 250 | GeForce 920MX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | None |
| Decoder | UVD 4.0 | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 250 draws 65W versus the GeForce 920MX's 16W — a 121% difference. The GeForce 920MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon R7 250) vs 350W (GeForce 920MX). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R7 250 | GeForce 920MX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W | 16W-75% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 16.2 | 66.5+310% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 250 launched at $89 MSRP and currently averages $25, while the GeForce 920MX launched at $100 and now averages $54. The Radeon R7 250 costs 53.7% less ($29 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 42.0 (Radeon R7 250) vs 19.7 (GeForce 920MX) — the Radeon R7 250 offers 113.2% better value. The GeForce 920MX is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon R7 250 | GeForce 920MX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $89-11% | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25-54% | $54 |
| Performance per Dollar | 42.0+113% | 19.7 |
| Codename | Oland | GM108 |
| Release | October 8 2013 | March 25 2016 |
| Ranking | #871 | #864 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R7 250 and GeForce 920MX
