G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R7 250 vs Radeon R7 M465 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R7 250 vs Radeon R7 M465: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R7 250

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $31 less on MSRP ($89 MSRP vs $120 MSRP).
✅Delivers 33.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.8 vs 8.8 G3D/$ ($89 MSRP vs $120 MSRP).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 65W instead of 75W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 M465 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R7 M465

2016

Why buy it

✅5.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
34.8% HIGHER MSRP
$120 MSRPvs$89 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.8 vs 11.8 G3D/$ ($120 MSRP vs $89 MSRP).
❌15.4% higher power demand at 75W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R7 M465 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 5.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.8% in PassMark G3D (1,059 vs 1,051), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R7 250 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 250 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $31 cheaper on MSRP at $89 vs $120, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 33.8% (11.8 vs 8.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon R7 M465 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon R7 250 vs Radeon R7 M465 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R7 250

The Radeon R7 250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,051 points. Launch price was $89.

Radeon R7 M465

The Radeon R7 M465 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1125 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,059 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 250 scores 1,051 and the Radeon R7 M465 reaches 1,059 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 250 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7 M465 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R7 250) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M465). Raw compute: 0.8064 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 250) vs 0.864 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M465). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 1125 MHz.

Feature	Radeon R7 250	Radeon R7 M465
G3D Mark Score	1,051	1,059
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 3.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8064 TFLOPS	0.864 TFLOPS+7%
Boost Clock	1050 MHz	1125 MHz+7%
ROPs	8	8
TMUs	24	24
L1 Cache	96 KB	96 KB
L2 Cache	256 KB+100%	128 KB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R7 250	Radeon R7 M465
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R7 250 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M465 carries 512 MB. Radeon R7 250 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R7 250 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M465. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon R7 250) vs 128 KB (Radeon R7 M465) — the Radeon R7 250 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon R7 250	Radeon R7 M465
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+300%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB+100%	128 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (Radeon R7 250) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R7 M465). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	Radeon R7 250	Radeon R7 M465
DirectX	11.1	12 (11_1)+8%
Vulkan	1.2	1.2
OpenGL	4.6+2%	4.5
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 250) vs VCE 3.1 (Radeon R7 M465). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 (Radeon R7 250) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon R7 M465).

Feature	Radeon R7 250	Radeon R7 M465
Encoder	VCE 1.0	VCE 3.1
Decoder	UVD 4.0	UVD 6.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 250 draws 65W versus the Radeon R7 M465's 75W — a 14.3% difference. The Radeon R7 250 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon R7 250) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M465). Power connectors: None vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85°C.

Feature	Radeon R7 250	Radeon R7 M465
TDP	65W-13%	75W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	Mobile
Length	168mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	75-12%	85°C
Perf/Watt	16.2+15%	14.1

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R7 250 came in at $89, while the Radeon R7 M465 launched at $120. On MSRP, Radeon R7 250 was 25.8% cheaper ($31 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.8 (Radeon R7 250) vs 8.8 (Radeon R7 M465) — the Radeon R7 250 offers 34.1% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 M465 (2016 vs 2013).

Feature	Radeon R7 250	Radeon R7 M465
MSRP	$89-26%	$120
Performance per Dollar	11.8+34%	8.8
Codename	Oland	Topaz
Release	October 8 2013	May 15 2016
Ranking	#871	#867

Search Radeon R7 250 on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 M465 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.