Radeon R7 250 vs Radeon R7 M350

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R7 250 vs Radeon R7 M350 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R7 250 vs Radeon R7 M350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R7 250

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $11 less on MSRP ($89 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 10.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.8 vs 10.7 G3D/$ ($89 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 M350 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Radeon R7 M350

2015

Why buy it

✅0.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
12.4% HIGHER MSRP
$100 MSRPvs$89 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.7 vs 11.8 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $89 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R7 M350 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 0.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.4% in PassMark G3D (1,066 vs 1,051), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R7 250 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 250 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $11 cheaper on MSRP at $89 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 10.8% (11.8 vs 10.7), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon R7 M350 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon R7 250 vs Radeon R7 M350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R7 250

The Radeon R7 250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,051 points. Launch price was $89.

Radeon R7 M350

The Radeon R7 M350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,066 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 250 scores 1,051 and the Radeon R7 M350 reaches 1,066 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 250 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7 M350 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R7 250) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M350). Raw compute: 0.8064 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 250) vs 0.7795 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M350). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 825 MHz.

Feature	Radeon R7 250	Radeon R7 M350
G3D Mark Score	1,051	1,066+1%
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 3.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8064 TFLOPS+3%	0.7795 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1050 MHz+27%	825 MHz
ROPs	8	8
TMUs	24	24
L1 Cache	96 KB	96 KB
L2 Cache	256 KB+100%	128 KB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R7 250	Radeon R7 M350
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R7 250 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M350 carries 512 MB. Radeon R7 250 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R7 250 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M350. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon R7 250) vs 128 KB (Radeon R7 M350) — the Radeon R7 250 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon R7 250	Radeon R7 M350
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+300%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB+100%	128 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 250 draws 65W versus the Radeon R7 M350's 35W — a 60% difference. The Radeon R7 M350 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon R7 250) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M350). Power connectors: None vs Mobile.

Feature	Radeon R7 250	Radeon R7 M350
TDP	65W	35W-46%
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	Mobile
Length	168mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	75	—
Perf/Watt	16.2	30.5+88%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R7 250 came in at $89, while the Radeon R7 M350 launched at $100. On MSRP, Radeon R7 250 was 11% cheaper ($11 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.8 (Radeon R7 250) vs 10.7 (Radeon R7 M350) — the Radeon R7 250 offers 10.3% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 M350 (2015 vs 2013).

Feature	Radeon R7 250	Radeon R7 M350
MSRP	$89-11%	$100
Performance per Dollar	11.8+10%	10.7
Codename	Oland	Meso
Release	October 8 2013	May 5 2015
Ranking	#871	#862

Search Radeon R7 250 on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 M350 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.