Radeon R7 250 vs RadeonT 610M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R7 250 vs RadeonT 610M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R7 250 vs RadeonT 610M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R7 250

2013

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($89 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RadeonT 610M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.

RadeonT 610M

2023

Why buy it

✅38.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $89 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RadeonT 610M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 38.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.6% in PassMark G3D (1,068 vs 1,051), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RadeonT 610M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 5nm process instead of 28nm, 2 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2013. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 250 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 250 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RadeonT 610M has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon R7 250 vs RadeonT 610M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R7 250

The Radeon R7 250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,051 points. Launch price was $89.

RadeonT 610M

The RadeonT 610M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,068 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 250 scores 1,051 and the RadeonT 610M reaches 1,068 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 250 is built on GCN 1.0 while the RadeonT 610M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R7 250) vs 128 (RadeonT 610M). Raw compute: 0.8064 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 250) vs 0.5632 TFLOPS (RadeonT 610M). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 2200 MHz.

Feature	Radeon R7 250	RadeonT 610M
G3D Mark Score	1,051	1,068+2%
Architecture	GCN 1.0	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	384+200%	128
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8064 TFLOPS+43%	0.5632 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1050 MHz	2200 MHz+110%
ROPs	8+100%	4
TMUs	24+200%	8
L1 Cache	96 KB+200%	32 KB
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling + RSR

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R7 250	RadeonT 610M
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R7 250 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the RadeonT 610M carries 512 MB. Radeon R7 250 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R7 250 and 64-bit on the RadeonT 610M. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 250) vs 2 MB (RadeonT 610M) — the RadeonT 610M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon R7 250	RadeonT 610M
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+300%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (Radeon R7 250) vs 12 (12_2) (RadeonT 610M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

Feature	Radeon R7 250	RadeonT 610M
DirectX	11.1	12 (12_2)+8%
Vulkan	1.2	1.3+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	2	3+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 250) vs VCN 3.0 (RadeonT 610M). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 (Radeon R7 250) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,JPEG (RadeonT 610M).

Feature	Radeon R7 250	RadeonT 610M
Encoder	VCE 1.0	VCN 3.0
Decoder	UVD 4.0	VCN 3.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,JPEG

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 250 draws 65W versus the RadeonT 610M's 15W — a 125% difference. The RadeonT 610M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon R7 250) vs 350W (RadeonT 610M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon R7 250	RadeonT 610M
TDP	65W	15W-77%
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	168mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	75	—
Perf/Watt	16.2	71.2+340%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RadeonT 610M (2023 vs 2013).

Feature	Radeon R7 250	RadeonT 610M
MSRP	$89	—
Codename	Oland	Dragon Range
Release	October 8 2013	January 3 2023
Ranking	#871	#843

Search Radeon R7 250 on Amazon

Search RadeonT 610M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.