Radeon R7 250
VS
Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU

Radeon R7 250 vs Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU

AMD

Radeon R7 250

2013Boost: 1050 MHz
VS

Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU

2018

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 250 is positioned at rank 107 and the Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU is on rank 465, so the Radeon R7 250 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 250

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
614%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
590%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
583%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
582%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
581%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
578%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
570%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
568%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
563%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
562%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
555%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
554%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
544%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
543%
#91
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
677%
#106
GeForce GT 640
MSRP: $99|Avg: $50
100%
#107
Radeon R7 250
MSRP: $89|Avg: $25
100%
#108
GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
100%
#110
Radeon HD 8550D
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
96%
#111
Radeon 520
MSRP: $78|Avg: $78
95%
#112
Radeon HD 4810
MSRP: $70|Avg: $15
94%
#114
GeForce 605
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
93%
#115
Radeon HD 8410G
MSRP: $40|Avg: $5
92%
#116
RADEON HD6530D
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
90%
#117
Moore Threads MTT S30
MSRP: $55|Avg: $55
89%
#118
Radeon 535
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
89%
#121
GeForce GTS 450
MSRP: $129|Avg: $20
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU

#455
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
2026%
#457
1836%
#458
1831%
#462
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1665%
#463
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1654%
#465
Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU
MSRP: $200|Avg: $100
100%
#466
Radeon HD 8550G + 8570M Dual
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
99%
#467
99%
#468
Radeon R5 M230
MSRP: $80|Avg: $25
99%
#469
Radeon HD 8650G + 8750M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
98%
#470
Radeon R9 M275X / M375
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
98%
#471
Radeon R9 M370X
MSRP: $300|Avg: $100
98%
#472
Radeon HD 8280
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
97%
#473
GeForce GTX 850A
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
95%
#474
95%
#475
Radeon R7 A10-7700K
MSRP: $152|Avg: $118
95%
#476
Mobility Radeon HD 5730
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
95%
#477
94%
#479
Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
MSRP: $699|Avg: $150
93%
#480
Radeon R5 M330
MSRP: $120|Avg: $20
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU uses modern memory architecture. The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R7 250 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R7 250 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon R7 250Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2%)
Leading raw performance (+2%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Legacy)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R7 250 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $25 versus $100 for the Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU, it costs 75% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 292.2% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R7 250Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+292.2%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($25)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 250 and Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU

AMD

Radeon R7 250

The Radeon R7 250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,051 points. Launch price was $89.

Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU

The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in December 6 2018. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,072 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 250 scores 1,051 and the Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU reaches 1,072 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.

FeatureRadeon R7 250Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU
G3D Mark Score
1,051
1,072+2%
Process Node
28 nm
5 nm

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R7 250Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R7 250 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU has 0 MB. The Radeon R7 250 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.

FeatureRadeon R7 250Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 250 draws 65W versus the Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU's 7W — a 161.1% difference. The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon R7 250) vs 1W (Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU). Power connectors: None vs Integrated.

FeatureRadeon R7 250Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU
TDP
65W
7W-89%
Recommended PSU
300W
1W-100%
Power Connector
None
Integrated
Length
168mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
16.2
153.1+845%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R7 250 launched at $89 MSRP and currently averages $25, while the Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU launched at $200 and now averages $100. The Radeon R7 250 costs 75% less ($75 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 42.0 (Radeon R7 250) vs 10.7 (Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU) — the Radeon R7 250 offers 292.5% better value. The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2013).

FeatureRadeon R7 250Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU
MSRP
$89-56%
$200
Avg Price (30d)
$25-75%
$100
Performance per Dollar
42.0+293%
10.7
Codename
Oland
Release
October 8 2013
December 6 2018
Ranking
#871
#860