CPU
GPU
Radeon R7 250
Popular choices:
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R7 250 is positioned at rank #107 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 250
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R7 250 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel UHD Graphics 620.
| Insight | Radeon R7 250 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon R7 250 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 250 and Intel UHD Graphics 620
Radeon R7 250
The Radeon R7 250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,051 points. Launch price was $89.
Intel UHD Graphics 620
The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,041 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 250 scores 1,051 and the Intel UHD Graphics 620 reaches 1,041 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 250 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Intel UHD Graphics 620 uses Generation 9.5, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm++. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R7 250) vs 192 (Intel UHD Graphics 620). Raw compute: 0.8064 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 250) vs 0.384 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 620). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R7 250 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,051 | 1,041 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Generation 9.5 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm++ |
| Shading Units | 384+100% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8064 TFLOPS+110% | 0.384 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1050 MHz+5% | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 8+167% | 3 |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 250 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R7 250 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics 620 has 0 MB. The Radeon R7 250 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | Radeon R7 250 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (Radeon R7 250) vs 12 (Intel UHD Graphics 620). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon R7 250 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 | 12+8% |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 250) vs QuickSync (Intel UHD Graphics 620). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 (Radeon R7 250) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Intel UHD Graphics 620).
| Feature | Radeon R7 250 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | QuickSync |
| Decoder | UVD 4.0 | QuickSync |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 | H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 250 draws 65W versus the Intel UHD Graphics 620's 15W — a 125% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon R7 250) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 620). Power connectors: None vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon R7 250 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W | 15W-77% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | None | Integrated |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 16.2 | 69.4+328% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 250 launched at $89 MSRP and currently averages $25, while the Intel UHD Graphics 620 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Intel UHD Graphics 620 costs 100+% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 42.0 (Radeon R7 250) vs Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 620) — the Intel UHD Graphics 620 offers Infinity% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon R7 250 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $89 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 42.0 | Infinity |
| Codename | Oland | Kaby Lake GT2 |
| Release | October 8 2013 | September 1 2017 |
| Ranking | #871 | #875 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R7 250 and Intel UHD Graphics 620
