Radeon R7 A10-8750 vs Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R7 A10-8750 vs Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R7 A10-8750 vs Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R7 A10-8750

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 55W instead of 295W, a 240W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
110.1% HIGHER MSRP
$250 MSRPvs$119 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.4 vs 7.0 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $119 MSRP).

Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600

2023

Why buy it

✅104.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $131 less on MSRP ($119 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
✅Delivers 105.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.0 vs 3.4 G3D/$ ($119 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌436.4% higher power demand at 295W vs 55W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 104.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R7 A10-8750 instead at 856 vs 837, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 5nm process instead of 28nm, 96 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2016. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $131 cheaper on MSRP at $119 vs $250, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 105.4% (7.0 vs 3.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon R7 A10-8750 vs Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R7 A10-8750

The Radeon R7 A10-8750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 6 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 856 points.

Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600

The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1855 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 837 points. Launch price was $3,999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 A10-8750 scores 856 and the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 reaches 837 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 A10-8750 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon R7 A10-8750) vs 6,144 (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600). Raw compute: 0.8192 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A10-8750) vs 61.32 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600).

Feature	Radeon R7 A10-8750	Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
G3D Mark Score	856+2%	837
Architecture	GCN 1.0	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	28 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	512	6144+1100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8192 TFLOPS	61.32 TFLOPS+7385%
ROPs	16	192+1100%
TMUs	32	384+1100%
L1 Cache	0.13 MB	3 MB+2208%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	6 MB+2300%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling + RSR

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R7 A10-8750	Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A10-8750 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 A10-8750) vs 6 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600) — the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon R7 A10-8750	Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	6 MB+2300%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 A10-8750 draws 55W versus the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600's 295W — a 137.1% difference. The Radeon R7 A10-8750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 A10-8750) vs 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon R7 A10-8750	Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
TDP	55W-81%	295W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	15.6+457%	2.8

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R7 A10-8750 came in at $250, while the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 launched at $119. On MSRP, Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 was 52.4% cheaper ($131 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.4 (Radeon R7 A10-8750) vs 7.0 (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600) — the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 offers 105.9% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 (2023 vs 2016).

Feature	Radeon R7 A10-8750	Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
MSRP	$250	$119-52%
Performance per Dollar	3.4	7.0+106%
Codename	Cape Verde	Navi 31
Release	July 6 2016	April 13 2023
Ranking	#667	#26

Search Radeon R7 A10-8750 on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.