Radeon R7 M370 vs Radeon R9 M365X

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 M370 is positioned at rank 354 and the Radeon R9 M365X is on rank 445, so the Radeon R7 M370 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 M370

#344

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

995%

#346

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

902%

#347

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

900%

#351

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

818%

#352

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

813%

#354

Radeon R7 M370

MSRP: $130|Avg: $40

100%

#357

Radeon 625

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

99%

#359

Radeon R7 M350

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

98%

#360

GeForce 920MX

MSRP: $100|Avg: $54

98%

#361

Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H

MSRP: $150|Avg: $45

97%

#362

Radeon HD 7670A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $40

96%

#363

Radeon Vega 8

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

96%

#367

GeForce 615

MSRP: $50|Avg: $15

93%

#369

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS

MSRP: $600|Avg: $600

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M365X

#435

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

1831%

#437

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

1660%

#438

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

1655%

#442

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

1505%

#443

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

1495%

#445

Radeon R9 M365X

MSRP: $250|Avg: $50

100%

#446

GeForce 7800 GS

MSRP: $30|Avg: $30

99%

#447

Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

99%

#448

Radeon R9 M265X

MSRP: $200|Avg: $30

98%

#449

Mobility Radeon HD 5165

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

98%

#450

Radeon R5 M435

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

97%

#451

Radeon E8860

MSRP: $300|Avg: $50

95%

#452

Radeon R7 M380

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

94%

#453

Radeon HD 7650A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $49

94%

#454

GeForce 820A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $30

94%

#455

Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

94%

#456

Radeon HD 7850M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

93%

#457

Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7730M Dual

MSRP: $160|Avg: $40

93%

#458

Radeon HD 8550G + HD 7600M Dual

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

92%

#459

Radeon HD 8450G + 8600M Dual

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

92%

#460

Radeon R9 M275X

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R9 M365X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.5% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 M370.

Insight	Radeon R7 M370	Radeon R9 M365X
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.5%)	✅Leading raw performance (+4.5%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+700%)
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R7 M370 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 M370 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $50), it costs 20% less, resulting in a 19.6% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon R7 M370	Radeon R9 M365X
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+19.6%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($40)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon R7 M370 Benchmark Check

Radeon R9 M365X Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 M370 and Radeon R9 M365X

Radeon R7 M370

The Radeon R7 M370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 960 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,418 points.

Radeon R9 M365X

The Radeon R9 M365X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,482 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 M370 scores 1,418 and the Radeon R9 M365X reaches 1,482 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 M370 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 M365X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R7 M370) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M365X). Raw compute: 0.7373 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M370) vs 1.184 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M365X). Boost clocks: 960 MHz vs 925 MHz.

Feature	Radeon R7 M370	Radeon R9 M365X
G3D Mark Score	1,418	1,482+5%
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	640+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7373 TFLOPS	1.184 TFLOPS+61%
Boost Clock	960 MHz+4%	925 MHz
ROPs	8	16+100%
TMUs	24	40+67%
L1 Cache	96 KB	160 KB+67%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R7 M370	Radeon R9 M365X
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R7 M370 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M365X has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 M365X offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	Radeon R7 M370	Radeon R9 M365X
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	4 GB+700%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 M370 draws 75W versus the Radeon R9 M365X's 75W — a 0% difference. The Radeon R9 M365X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 M370) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M365X). Power connectors: Mobile vs Mobile.

Feature	Radeon R7 M370	Radeon R9 M365X
TDP	75W	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Mobile	Mobile
Perf/Watt	18.9	19.8+5%

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R7 M370 launched at $130 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Radeon R9 M365X launched at $250 and now averages $50. The Radeon R7 M370 costs 20% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 35.5 (Radeon R7 M370) vs 29.6 (Radeon R9 M365X) — the Radeon R7 M370 offers 19.9% better value.