Quadro 4000 vs Radeon R7 M370

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 4000 vs Radeon R7 M370 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro 4000 vs Radeon R7 M370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 4000

2010

Why buy it

✅103.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
822.3% HIGHER MSRP
$1,199 MSRPvs$130 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.2 vs 10.9 G3D/$ ($1,199 MSRP vs $130 MSRP).
❌89.3% higher power demand at 142W vs 75W.

Radeon R7 M370

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,069 less on MSRP ($130 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
✅Delivers 786.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.9 vs 1.2 G3D/$ ($130 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 142W, a 67W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro 4000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro 4000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 103.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 4% in PassMark G3D (1,475 vs 1,418), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro 4000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 M370 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,069 cheaper on MSRP at $130 vs $1,199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 786.7% (10.9 vs 1.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 M370 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro 4000 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro 4000 vs Radeon R7 M370 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro 4000

The Quadro 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 2 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 475 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 142W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,475 points. Launch price was $1,199.

Radeon R7 M370

The Radeon R7 M370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 960 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,418 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 4000 scores 1,475 and the Radeon R7 M370 reaches 1,418 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 4000 is built on Fermi while the Radeon R7 M370 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 256 (Quadro 4000) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M370). Raw compute: 0.4864 TFLOPS (Quadro 4000) vs 0.7373 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M370).

Feature	Quadro 4000	Radeon R7 M370
G3D Mark Score	1,475+4%	1,418
Architecture	Fermi	GCN 1.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	256	384+50%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.4864 TFLOPS	0.7373 TFLOPS+52%
ROPs	32+300%	8
TMUs	32+33%	24
L1 Cache	512 KB+433%	96 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro 4000	Radeon R7 M370
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 4000 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M370 carries 512 MB. Quadro 4000 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 4000 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M370. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Quadro 4000) vs 256 KB (Radeon R7 M370) — the Quadro 4000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro 4000	Radeon R7 M370
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+300%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 4000 draws 142W versus the Radeon R7 M370's 75W — a 61.8% difference. The Radeon R7 M370 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 4000) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M370). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	Quadro 4000	Radeon R7 M370
TDP	142W	75W-47%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Perf/Watt	10.4	18.9+82%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro 4000 came in at $1199, while the Radeon R7 M370 launched at $130. On MSRP, Radeon R7 M370 was 89.2% cheaper ($1069 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.2 (Quadro 4000) vs 10.9 (Radeon R7 M370) — the Radeon R7 M370 offers 808.3% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 M370 (2015 vs 2010).

Feature	Quadro 4000	Radeon R7 M370
MSRP	$1199	$130-89%
Performance per Dollar	1.2	10.9+808%
Codename	GF100	Litho
Release	November 2 2010	May 5 2015
Ranking	#770	#778

Search Quadro 4000 on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 M370 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.