Radeon R7 M370 vs Tesla M2090
Radeon R7 M370
Popular choices:
Tesla M2090
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 M370 is positioned at rank 354 and the Tesla M2090 is on rank 379, so the Radeon R7 M370 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 M370
Performance Per Dollar Tesla M2090
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R7 M370 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla M2090.
| Insight | Radeon R7 M370 | Tesla M2090 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (248mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R7 M370 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 M370 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $40), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 1.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R7 M370 | Tesla M2090 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 M370 and Tesla M2090
Radeon R7 M370
The Radeon R7 M370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 960 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,418 points.
Tesla M2090
The Tesla M2090 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 651 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,400 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 M370 scores 1,418 and the Tesla M2090 reaches 1,400 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 M370 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Tesla M2090 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R7 M370) vs 512 (Tesla M2090). Raw compute: 0.7373 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M370) vs 1.332 TFLOPS (Tesla M2090).
| Feature | Radeon R7 M370 | Tesla M2090 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,418+1% | 1,400 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 512+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7373 TFLOPS | 1.332 TFLOPS+81% |
| ROPs | 8 | 48+500% |
| TMUs | 24 | 64+167% |
| L1 Cache | 0.09 MB | 1 MB+1011% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 M370 | Tesla M2090 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon R7 M370) vs 768 KB (Tesla M2090) — the Tesla M2090 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R7 M370 | Tesla M2090 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 M370 draws 75W versus the Tesla M2090's 250W — a 107.7% difference. The Radeon R7 M370 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 M370) vs 350W (Tesla M2090). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R7 M370 | Tesla M2090 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-70% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 248mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 18.9+238% | 5.6 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 M370 launched at $130 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Tesla M2090 launched at $2500 and now averages $40. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 35.5 (Radeon R7 M370) vs 35.0 (Tesla M2090) — the Radeon R7 M370 offers 1.4% better value. The Radeon R7 M370 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon R7 M370 | Tesla M2090 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $130-95% | $2500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | $40 |
| Performance per Dollar | 35.5+1% | 35.0 |
| Codename | Litho | GF110 |
| Release | May 5 2015 | July 25 2011 |
| Ranking | #778 | #530 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R7 M370 and Tesla M2090
