Radeon R7 M370 vs Tesla M2090

AMD

Radeon R7 M370

2015Core: 900 MHzBoost: 960 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Tesla M2090

2011Core: 651 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon R7 M370 vs Tesla M2090 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R7 M370 vs Tesla M2090: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R7 M370

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $2,370 less on MSRP ($130 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
  • Delivers 1847.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.9 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($130 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
  • Draws 75W instead of 250W, a 175W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Tesla M2090

2011

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • 2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 1823.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,500 MSRPvs$130 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.6 vs 10.9 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $130 MSRP).
  • 233.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R7 M370 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.3% in PassMark G3D (1,418 vs 1,400), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R7 M370 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 28nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 M370 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,370 cheaper on MSRP at $130 vs $2,500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1847.8% (10.9 vs 0.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon R7 M370 vs Tesla M2090 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon R7 M370

The Radeon R7 M370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 960 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,418 points.

NVIDIA

Tesla M2090

The Tesla M2090 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 651 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,400 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 M370 scores 1,418 and the Tesla M2090 reaches 1,400 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 M370 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Tesla M2090 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R7 M370) vs 512 (Tesla M2090). Raw compute: 0.7373 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M370) vs 1.332 TFLOPS (Tesla M2090).

FeatureRadeon R7 M370Tesla M2090
G3D Mark Score
1,418+1%
1,400
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Fermi 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384
512+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7373 TFLOPS
1.332 TFLOPS+81%
ROPs
8
48+500%
TMUs
24
64+167%
L1 Cache
0.09 MB
1 MB+1011%
L2 Cache
256 KB
768 KB+200%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R7 M370Tesla M2090
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M370 and 64-bit on the Tesla M2090. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon R7 M370) vs 768 KB (Tesla M2090) — the Tesla M2090 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R7 M370Tesla M2090
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
768 KB+200%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 M370 draws 75W versus the Tesla M2090's 250W — a 107.7% difference. The Radeon R7 M370 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 M370) vs 350W (Tesla M2090). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon R7 M370Tesla M2090
TDP
75W-70%
250W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Mobile
PCIe-powered
Length
248mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Perf/Watt
18.9+238%
5.6
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R7 M370 came in at $130, while the Tesla M2090 launched at $2500. On MSRP, Radeon R7 M370 was 94.8% cheaper ($2370 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.9 (Radeon R7 M370) vs 0.6 (Tesla M2090) — the Radeon R7 M370 offers 1716.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 M370 (2015 vs 2011).

FeatureRadeon R7 M370Tesla M2090
MSRP
$130-95%
$2500
Performance per Dollar
10.9+1717%
0.6
Codename
Litho
GF110
Release
May 5 2015
July 25 2011
Ranking
#778
#530

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.