Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs FirePro S9000
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
Popular choices:
FirePro S9000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition is positioned at rank 350 and the FirePro S9000 is on rank 291, so the FirePro S9000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
Performance Per Dollar FirePro S9000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro S9000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition | FirePro S9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro S9000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro S9000 holds the technical lead. Priced at $156 (vs $450), it costs 65% less, resulting in a 191.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition | FirePro S9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+191.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($450) | ✅More affordable ($156) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition and FirePro S9000
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 23 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.
FirePro S9000
The FirePro S9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 24 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,059 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition scores 5,000 and the FirePro S9000 reaches 5,059 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition is built on GCN 3.0 while the FirePro S9000 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition) vs 1,792 (FirePro S9000). Raw compute: 3.482 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition) vs 3.226 TFLOPS (FirePro S9000).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition | FirePro S9000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,000 | 5,059+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+14% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.482 TFLOPS+8% | 3.226 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+14% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+14% | 448 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition | FirePro S9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro S9000 has 4 GB. The FirePro S9000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition) vs 768 KB (FirePro S9000) — the FirePro S9000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition | FirePro S9000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition draws 250W versus the FirePro S9000's 225W — a 10.5% difference. The FirePro S9000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition) vs 350W (FirePro S9000). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition | FirePro S9000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 225W-10% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 90°C |
| Perf/Watt | 20.0 | 22.5+13% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition launched at $450 MSRP and currently averages $450, while the FirePro S9000 launched at $2499 and now averages $156. The FirePro S9000 costs 65.3% less ($294 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 11.1 (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition) vs 32.4 (FirePro S9000) — the FirePro S9000 offers 191.9% better value. The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition | FirePro S9000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $450-82% | $2499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $450 | $156-65% |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.1 | 32.4+192% |
| Codename | Amethyst | Tahiti |
| Release | November 23 2014 | August 24 2012 |
| Ranking | #436 | #441 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition and FirePro S9000
