Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs GeForce GTX 1630
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 1630
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition is positioned at rank #350 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1630
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce GTX 1630 is significantly newer (2022 vs 2014). The GeForce GTX 1630 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 1630 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1630 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $90 versus $450 for the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition, it costs 80% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 399.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+399.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($450) | ✅More affordable ($90) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition and GeForce GTX 1630
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 23 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.
GeForce GTX 1630
The GeForce GTX 1630 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2022. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1740 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,992 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition scores 5,000 and the GeForce GTX 1630 reaches 4,992 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition is built on GCN 3.0 while the GeForce GTX 1630 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition) vs 512 (GeForce GTX 1630). Raw compute: 3.482 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition) vs 1.828 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1630).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,000 | 4,992 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+300% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.482 TFLOPS+90% | 1.828 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+300% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1630 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1630 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 174 GB/s (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition) vs 96 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1630) — a 81.3% advantage for the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1630) — the GeForce GTX 1630 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 174 GB/s+81% | 96 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition draws 250W versus the GeForce GTX 1630's 75W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1630). Power connectors: Mobile vs None.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 75W-70% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | None |
| Length | — | 145mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 60°C |
| Perf/Watt | 20.0 | 66.6+233% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition launched at $450 MSRP and currently averages $450, while the GeForce GTX 1630 launched at $150 and now averages $90. The GeForce GTX 1630 costs 80% less ($360 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 11.1 (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition) vs 55.5 (GeForce GTX 1630) — the GeForce GTX 1630 offers 400% better value. The GeForce GTX 1630 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $450 | $150-67% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $450 | $90-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.1 | 55.5+400% |
| Codename | Amethyst | TU117 |
| Release | November 23 2014 | June 28 2022 |
| Ranking | #436 | #444 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition and GeForce GTX 1630
