Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs CMP 30HX
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
Popular choices:
CMP 30HX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition is positioned at rank 350 and the CMP 30HX is on rank 190, so the CMP 30HX offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
Performance Per Dollar CMP 30HX
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The CMP 30HX is significantly newer (2021 vs 2014). The CMP 30HX likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the CMP 30HX.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition | CMP 30HX |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The CMP 30HX offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $60 versus $450 for the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition, it costs 87% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 633.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition | CMP 30HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+633.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($450) | ✅More affordable ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition and CMP 30HX
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 23 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.
CMP 30HX
The CMP 30HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,892 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition scores 5,000 and the CMP 30HX reaches 4,892 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition is built on GCN 3.0 while the CMP 30HX uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition) vs 1,408 (CMP 30HX). Raw compute: 3.482 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition) vs 5.027 TFLOPS (CMP 30HX).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition | CMP 30HX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,000+2% | 4,892 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+45% | 1408 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.482 TFLOPS | 5.027 TFLOPS+44% |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 128+45% | 88 |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1.4 MB+180% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1.5 MB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition | CMP 30HX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition) vs 1.5 MB (CMP 30HX) — the CMP 30HX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition | CMP 30HX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1.5 MB+200% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition draws 250W versus the CMP 30HX's 125W — a 66.7% difference. The CMP 30HX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition) vs 350W (CMP 30HX). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition | CMP 30HX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 125W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 229mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 20.0 | 39.1+96% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition launched at $450 MSRP and currently averages $450, while the CMP 30HX launched at $799 and now averages $60. The CMP 30HX costs 86.7% less ($390 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 11.1 (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition) vs 81.5 (CMP 30HX) — the CMP 30HX offers 634.2% better value. The CMP 30HX is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition | CMP 30HX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $450-44% | $799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $450 | $60-87% |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.1 | 81.5+634% |
| Codename | Amethyst | TU116 |
| Release | November 23 2014 | February 25 2021 |
| Ranking | #436 | #447 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition and CMP 30HX
