Radeon R9 M295X
VS
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

Radeon R9 M295X vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

AMD

Radeon R9 M295X

2014Core: 723 MHz

Popular choices:

RTX 4060•RTX 3060•RTX 4060 Ti•RTX 3070•GTX 1650•RTX 3060 Ti•RTX 4070•RTX 3050•RX 7600•RTX 4070 Ti
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

2011Core: 732 MHz

Popular choices:

RTX 4060•RTX 3060•RTX 4060 Ti•RTX 3070•GTX 1650•RTX 3060 Ti•RTX 4070•RTX 3050•RX 7600•RTX 4070 Ti

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Radeon R9 M295X
250
5,150
0.0%
brand logoRadeon HD 6970
brand logoRadeon HD8970M
brand logoRadeon RX Vega M GL / 870
brand logoRadeon HD 7870
brand logoRadeon RX 590
brand logoRadeon RX 6700M
brand logoRadeon 8060S
brand logoRadeon RX 6800
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
210
5,200
+1.0%
brand logoGeForce MX350
brand logoGeForce GTX 960A
brand logoGeForce GTX 660
brand logoGeForce MX550
brand logoGeForce GTX 780 Ti
brand logoGeForce GTX 1070
brand logoGeForce GTX 1070 SLI (móvel)
brand logoRTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R9 M295X is positioned at rank #273 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M295X

#263
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
632%
#265
GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150
573%
#266
GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100
572%
#270
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
520%
#271
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
516%
#273
Radeon R9 M295X
MSRP: $300|Avg: $150
100%
#274
GeForce GT 325M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $20
99%
#275
GeForce GTS 160M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
99%
#276
GeForce GTX 470M SLI
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $60
99%
#277
Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 3 3200G
MSRP: $99|Avg: $70
98%
#279
Radeon RX Vega 9
MSRP: $99|Avg: $50
98%
#282
Iris Xe Graphics G7
MSRP: $200|Avg: $100
96%
#283
Radeon R9 M395
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
96%
#285
GeForce GT 755M SLI
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
96%
#286
GeForce GTX 950A
MSRP: $159|Avg: $30
95%
#288
Radeon 540X
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 M295X.

InsightRadeon R9 M295XGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
Performance
❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%)
✅Leading raw performance (+1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $150), it costs 80% less, resulting in a 404.9% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R9 M295XGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
Cost Efficiency
❌Lower cost efficiency
✅Better overall value (+404.9%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150)
✅More affordable ($30)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon R9 M295X Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080p
low134 FPS
medium95 FPS
high73 FPS
ultra54 FPS
1440p
low85 FPS
medium60 FPS
high48 FPS
ultra34 FPS
4K
low37 FPS
medium29 FPS
high23 FPS
ultra15 FPS
Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080p
low132 FPS
medium97 FPS
high75 FPS
ultra56 FPS
1440p
low99 FPS
medium73 FPS
high57 FPS
ultra41 FPS
4K
low35 FPS
medium28 FPS
high23 FPS
ultra15 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080p
low190 FPS
medium135 FPS
high107 FPS
ultra64 FPS
1440p
low102 FPS
medium77 FPS
high55 FPS
ultra35 FPS
4K
low40 FPS
medium30 FPS
high23 FPS
ultra16 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080p
low127 FPS
medium94 FPS
high72 FPS
ultra51 FPS
1440p
low77 FPS
medium60 FPS
high39 FPS
ultra26 FPS
4K
low32 FPS
medium24 FPS
high17 FPS
ultra12 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080p
low232 FPS
medium185 FPS
high154 FPS
ultra116 FPS
1440p
low174 FPS
medium139 FPS
high116 FPS
ultra87 FPS
4K
low116 FPS
medium93 FPS
high77 FPS
ultra58 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080p
low234 FPS
medium187 FPS
high156 FPS
ultra117 FPS
1440p
low176 FPS
medium140 FPS
high117 FPS
ultra88 FPS
4K
low84 FPS
medium74 FPS
high68 FPS
ultra44 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080p
low173 FPS
medium142 FPS
high120 FPS
ultra80 FPS
1440p
low101 FPS
medium85 FPS
high68 FPS
ultra44 FPS
4K
low44 FPS
medium36 FPS
high22 FPS
ultra15 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080p
low168 FPS
medium137 FPS
high111 FPS
ultra68 FPS
1440p
low97 FPS
medium84 FPS
high64 FPS
ultra38 FPS
4K
low42 FPS
medium34 FPS
high21 FPS
ultra13 FPS
Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M295X and GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

AMD

Radeon R9 M295X

The Radeon R9 M295X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 23 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,150 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 29 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,200 points. Launch price was $289.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 M295X scores 5,150 and the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 reaches 5,200 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M295X is built on GCN 3.0 while the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon R9 M295X) vs 448 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448). Raw compute: 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M295X) vs 1.312 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448).

FeatureRadeon R9 M295XGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
G3D Mark Score
5,150
5,200
Architecture
GCN 3.0
Fermi 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
2048+357%
448
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.961 TFLOPS+126%
1.312 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
40+25%
TMUs
128+129%
56
L1 Cache
512 KB
896 KB+75%
L2 Cache
512 KB
640 KB+25%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R9 M295XGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 176 GB/s (Radeon R9 M295X) vs 156 GB/s (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) — a 12.8% advantage for the Radeon R9 M295X. Bus width: 256-bit vs 320-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon R9 M295X) vs 640 KB (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) — the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R9 M295XGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
176 GB/s+13%
156 GB/s
Bus Width
256-bit
320-bit+25%
L2 Cache
512 KB
640 KB+25%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (Radeon R9 M295X) vs 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.

FeatureRadeon R9 M295XGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
DirectX
12
12 (FL 11_0)
Max Displays
0
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 M295X) vs UVD 4.0 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs PureVideo VP4.

FeatureRadeon R9 M295XGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
Encoder
VCE 3.0
UVD 4.0
Decoder
UVD 4.2
PureVideo VP4
Codecs
—
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 M295X draws 250W versus the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448's 210W — a 17.4% difference. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M295X) vs 550W (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448). Power connectors: Mobile vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

FeatureRadeon R9 M295XGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
TDP
250W
210W-16%
Recommended PSU
350W-36%
550W
Power Connector
Mobile
2x 6-pin
Length
1mm
267mm
Height
—
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
—
76°C
Perf/Watt
20.6
24.8+20%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R9 M295X launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 launched at $289 and now averages $30. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 costs 80% less ($120 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 34.3 (Radeon R9 M295X) vs 173.3 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) — the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 offers 405.2% better value. The Radeon R9 M295X is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2011).

FeatureRadeon R9 M295XGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
MSRP
$300
$289-4%
Avg Price (30d)
$150
$30-80%
Performance per Dollar
34.3
173.3+405%
Codename
Amethyst
GF110
Release
November 23 2014
November 29 2011
Ranking
#437
#571