Radeon R9 M295X vs Radeon R9 M395X

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R9 M295X vs Radeon R9 M395X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R9 M295X vs Radeon R9 M395X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R9 M295X

2014

Why buy it

✅0.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
✅Delivers 101.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.2 vs 8.5 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌233.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 75W.

Radeon R9 M395X

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 75W instead of 250W, a 175W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 M295X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
100% HIGHER MSRP
$600 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.5 vs 17.2 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R9 M295X is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 0.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.6% in PassMark G3D (5,150 vs 5,120), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R9 M295X is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 M295X makes the most sense to buy today. It is $300 cheaper on MSRP at $300 vs $600, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 101.2% (17.2 vs 8.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon R9 M295X vs Radeon R9 M395X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R9 M295X

The Radeon R9 M295X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 23 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,150 points.

Radeon R9 M395X

The Radeon R9 M395X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,120 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 M295X scores 5,150 and the Radeon R9 M395X reaches 5,120 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M295X is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon R9 M395X uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon R9 M295X) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M395X). Raw compute: 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M295X) vs 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M395X).

Feature	Radeon R9 M295X	Radeon R9 M395X
G3D Mark Score	5,150	5,120
Architecture	GCN 3.0	GCN 3.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2048	2048
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.961 TFLOPS	2.961 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	128	128
L1 Cache	512 KB	512 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R9 M295X	Radeon R9 M395X
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 176 GB/s (Radeon R9 M295X) vs 160 GB/s (Radeon R9 M395X) — a 10% advantage for the Radeon R9 M295X. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Radeon R9 M295X and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 M395X.

Feature	Radeon R9 M295X	Radeon R9 M395X
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	176 GB/s+10%	160 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit	256-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 M295X draws 250W versus the Radeon R9 M395X's 75W — a 107.7% difference. The Radeon R9 M395X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M295X) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M395X). Power connectors: Mobile vs Mobile.

Feature	Radeon R9 M295X	Radeon R9 M395X
TDP	250W	75W-70%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Mobile	Mobile
Length	1mm	—
Slots	0	—
Perf/Watt	20.6	68.3+232%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R9 M295X came in at $300, while the Radeon R9 M395X launched at $600. On MSRP, Radeon R9 M295X was 50% cheaper ($300 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 17.2 (Radeon R9 M295X) vs 8.5 (Radeon R9 M395X) — the Radeon R9 M295X offers 102.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M395X (2015 vs 2014).

Feature	Radeon R9 M295X	Radeon R9 M395X
MSRP	$300-50%	$600
Performance per Dollar	17.2+102%	8.5
Codename	Amethyst	Amethyst
Release	November 23 2014	May 5 2015
Ranking	#437	#438

Search Radeon R9 M295X on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 M395X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.