
Radeon HD 8990 vs Radeon R9 M295X

Radeon HD 8990
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M295X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M295X
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 8990 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R9 M295X offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8990 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R9 M295X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 M295X holds the technical lead. Priced at $150 (vs $999), it costs 85% less, resulting in a 557.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8990 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+557.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($999) | ✅More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8990 and Radeon R9 M295X

Radeon HD 8990
The Radeon HD 8990 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 950 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,214 points. Launch price was $999.

Radeon R9 M295X
The Radeon R9 M295X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 23 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,150 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 8990 scores 5,214 and the Radeon R9 M295X reaches 5,150 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 8990 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 M295X uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon HD 8990) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M295X). Raw compute: 4.096 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 8990) vs 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M295X).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8990 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,214+1% | 5,150 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 ×2 | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.096 TFLOPS ×2+38% | 2.961 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 ×2 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128 ×2 | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 8990 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 8990 comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M295X has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 M295X offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s x2 (Radeon HD 8990) vs 176 GB/s (Radeon R9 M295X) — a 1537.5% advantage for the Radeon HD 8990. Bus width: 384-bit x2 vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (Radeon HD 8990) vs 512 KB (Radeon R9 M295X) — the Radeon HD 8990 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8990 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | 4 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s x2+64% | 176 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit x2+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 8990 draws 375W versus the Radeon R9 M295X's 250W — a 40% difference. The Radeon R9 M295X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (Radeon HD 8990) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M295X). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8990 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 375W | 250W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 350W-53% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 13.9 | 20.6+48% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 8990 launched at $999 MSRP and currently averages $999, while the Radeon R9 M295X launched at $300 and now averages $150. The Radeon R9 M295X costs 85% less ($849 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.2 (Radeon HD 8990) vs 34.3 (Radeon R9 M295X) — the Radeon R9 M295X offers 559.6% better value. The Radeon R9 M295X is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8990 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | $300-70% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $999 | $150-85% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.2 | 34.3+560% |
| Codename | Malta | Amethyst |
| Release | April 24 2013 | November 23 2014 |
| Ranking | #412 | #437 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















