
Radeon HD 8990 vs Tesla K80

Radeon HD 8990
Popular choices:

Tesla K80
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Tesla K80
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Tesla K80 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (4 GB vs 3 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 8990.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8990 | Tesla K80 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Tesla K80 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Tesla K80 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $999), it costs 95% less, resulting in a 1955.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8990 | Tesla K80 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1955.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($999) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8990 and Tesla K80

Radeon HD 8990
The Radeon HD 8990 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 950 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,214 points. Launch price was $999.

Tesla K80
The Tesla K80 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 17 2014. It features the Kepler 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 824 MHz. It has 2496 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,363 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 8990 scores 5,214 and the Tesla K80 reaches 5,363 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 8990 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Tesla K80 uses Kepler 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon HD 8990) vs 2,496 (Tesla K80). Raw compute: 4.096 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 8990) vs 4.113 TFLOPS ×2 (Tesla K80). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 824 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8990 | Tesla K80 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,214 | 5,363+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 ×2 | 2496 ×2+22% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.096 TFLOPS ×2 | 4.113 TFLOPS ×2 |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz+21% | 824 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 ×2 | 48 ×2+50% |
| TMUs | 128 ×2 | 208 ×2+63% |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+146% | 208 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1.5 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 8990 | Tesla K80 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 8990 comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla K80 has 4 GB. The Tesla K80 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit x2 vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (Radeon HD 8990) vs 1.5 MB (Tesla K80) — the Tesla K80 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8990 | Tesla K80 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | 4 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit x2+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1.5 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 8990 draws 375W versus the Tesla K80's 300W — a 22.2% difference. The Tesla K80 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (Radeon HD 8990) vs 350W (Tesla K80). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8990 | Tesla K80 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 375W | 300W-20% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 350W-53% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 13.9 | 17.9+29% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 8990 launched at $999 MSRP and currently averages $999, while the Tesla K80 launched at $5000 and now averages $50. The Tesla K80 costs 95% less ($949 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.2 (Radeon HD 8990) vs 107.3 (Tesla K80) — the Tesla K80 offers 1963.5% better value. The Tesla K80 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8990 | Tesla K80 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999-80% | $5000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $999 | $50-95% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.2 | 107.3+1963% |
| Codename | Malta | GK210 |
| Release | April 24 2013 | November 17 2014 |
| Ranking | #412 | #419 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















