GeForce GTX 760 Ti vs Radeon R9 M295X

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M295X

#263

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

632%

#265

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

573%

#266

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

572%

#270

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

520%

#271

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

516%

#273

Radeon R9 M295X

MSRP: $300|Avg: $150

100%

#274

GeForce GT 325M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $20

99%

#275

GeForce GTS 160M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30

99%

#276

GeForce GTX 470M SLI

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $60

99%

#277

Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 3 3200G

MSRP: $99|Avg: $70

98%

#279

Radeon RX Vega 9

MSRP: $99|Avg: $50

98%

#282

Iris Xe Graphics G7

MSRP: $200|Avg: $100

96%

#283

Radeon R9 M395

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

96%

#285

GeForce GT 755M SLI

MSRP: $200|Avg: $50

96%

#286

GeForce GTX 950A

MSRP: $159|Avg: $30

95%

#288

Radeon 540X

MSRP: $99|Avg: $40

93%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R9 M295X offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	GeForce GTX 760 Ti	Radeon R9 M295X
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+3%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-3%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R9 M295X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 M295X holds the technical lead. Priced at $150 (vs $249), it costs 40% less, resulting in a 61.1% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GeForce GTX 760 Ti	Radeon R9 M295X
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+61.1%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($249)	✅More affordable ($150)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon R9 M295X Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 760 Ti and Radeon R9 M295X

GeForce GTX 760 Ti

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 7 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 875 MHz to 928 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,307 points. Launch price was $699.

Radeon R9 M295X

The Radeon R9 M295X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 23 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,150 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti scores 5,307 and the Radeon R9 M295X reaches 5,150 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760 Ti is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 M295X uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,880 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M295X). Raw compute: 5.345 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M295X).

Feature	GeForce GTX 760 Ti	Radeon R9 M295X
G3D Mark Score	5,307+3%	5,150
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 3.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2880+41%	2048
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.345 TFLOPS+81%	2.961 TFLOPS
ROPs	48+50%	32
TMUs	240+88%	128
L1 Cache	240 KB	512 KB+113%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+200%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 760 Ti	Radeon R9 M295X
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M295X has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 M295X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 176 GB/s (Radeon R9 M295X) — a 9.1% advantage for the GeForce GTX 760 Ti. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 M295X) — the GeForce GTX 760 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760 Ti	Radeon R9 M295X
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	192 GB/s+9%	176 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit	256-bit
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+200%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11_0 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 12 (Radeon R9 M295X). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760 Ti	Radeon R9 M295X
DirectX	11_0	12+9%
Max Displays	4	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 3rd Gen (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 M295X). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs UVD 4.2.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760 Ti	Radeon R9 M295X
Encoder	NVENC 3rd Gen	VCE 3.0
Decoder	NVDEC 1st Gen	UVD 4.2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti draws 250W versus the Radeon R9 M295X's 250W — a 0% difference. The Radeon R9 M295X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M295X). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 241mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760 Ti	Radeon R9 M295X
TDP	250W	250W
Recommended PSU	500W	350W-30%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	Mobile
Length	241mm	1mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Perf/Watt	21.2+3%	20.6

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti launched at $249 MSRP and currently averages $249, while the Radeon R9 M295X launched at $300 and now averages $150. The Radeon R9 M295X costs 39.8% less ($99 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 21.3 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 34.3 (Radeon R9 M295X) — the Radeon R9 M295X offers 61% better value. The Radeon R9 M295X is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce GTX 760 Ti	Radeon R9 M295X
MSRP	$249-17%	$300
Avg Price (30d)	$249	$150-40%
Performance per Dollar	21.3	34.3+61%
Codename	GK110B	Amethyst
Release	November 7 2013	November 23 2014
Ranking	#278	#437