G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R9 M295X vs Radeon RX 6300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R9 M295X vs Radeon RX 6300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R9 M295X

2014

Why buy it

✅18.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Measures 1mm instead of 160mm, a 159mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
400% HIGHER MSRP
$300 MSRPvs$60 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.2 vs 88.7 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
❌614.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 35W.

Radeon RX 6300

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $240 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Delivers 416.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 88.7 vs 17.2 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 35W instead of 250W, a 215W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 M295X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌15900% longer card at 160mm vs 1mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R9 M295X is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 18.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon RX 6300 instead at 5,319 vs 5,150, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 6300 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: native frame generation with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023), while Radeon R9 M295X has no comparable frame-generation support, a 6nm process instead of 28nm, 12 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2014. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon RX 6300 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $240 cheaper on MSRP at $60 vs $300, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 416.4% (88.7 vs 17.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon R9 M295X still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon R9 M295X vs Radeon RX 6300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R9 M295X

The Radeon R9 M295X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 23 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,150 points.

Radeon RX 6300

The Radeon RX 6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,319 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 M295X scores 5,150 and the Radeon RX 6300 reaches 5,319 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M295X is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon RX 6300 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon R9 M295X) vs 768 (Radeon RX 6300). Raw compute: 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M295X) vs 3.686 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6300).

Feature	Radeon R9 M295X	Radeon RX 6300
G3D Mark Score	5,150	5,319+3%
Architecture	GCN 3.0	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	2048+167%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.961 TFLOPS	3.686 TFLOPS+24%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	128+167%	48
L1 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR 3 + AFMF

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 6300 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon R9 M295X does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

Feature	Radeon R9 M295X	Radeon RX 6300
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR 3
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 176 GB/s (Radeon R9 M295X) vs 64 GB/s (Radeon RX 6300) — a 175% advantage for the Radeon R9 M295X. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Radeon R9 M295X and 32-bit on the Radeon RX 6300. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 M295X) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6300) — the Radeon RX 6300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon R9 M295X	Radeon RX 6300
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	176 GB/s+175%	64 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit+700%	32-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (Radeon R9 M295X) vs 12_2 (Radeon RX 6300). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.

Feature	Radeon R9 M295X	Radeon RX 6300
DirectX	12	12_2
Max Displays	0	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 M295X) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6300). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs VCN 3.0.

Feature	Radeon R9 M295X	Radeon RX 6300
Encoder	VCE 3.0	VCN 3.0
Decoder	UVD 4.2	VCN 3.0

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 M295X draws 250W versus the Radeon RX 6300's 35W — a 150.9% difference. The Radeon RX 6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M295X) vs 300W (Radeon RX 6300). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 160mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.

Feature	Radeon R9 M295X	Radeon RX 6300
TDP	250W	35W-86%
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	Mobile	PCIe-powered
Length	1mm	160mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Perf/Watt	20.6	152.0+638%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R9 M295X came in at $300, while the Radeon RX 6300 launched at $60. On MSRP, Radeon RX 6300 was 80% cheaper ($240 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 17.2 (Radeon R9 M295X) vs 88.7 (Radeon RX 6300) — the Radeon RX 6300 offers 415.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 6300 (2022 vs 2014).

Feature	Radeon R9 M295X	Radeon RX 6300
MSRP	$300	$60-80%
Performance per Dollar	17.2	88.7+416%
Codename	Amethyst	Navi 24
Release	November 23 2014	January 4 2022
Ranking	#437	#379

Search Radeon R9 M295X on Amazon

Search Radeon RX 6300 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.