
Radeon R9 M295X
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R9 M295X is positioned at rank #273 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M295X
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R9 M295X offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M295X | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (275mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $150), it costs 73% less, resulting in a 282.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M295X | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+282.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M295X and Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X

Radeon R9 M295X
The Radeon R9 M295X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 23 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,150 points.

Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X
The Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,248 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 M295X scores 5,150 and the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X reaches 5,248 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M295X is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon R9 M295X) vs 2,048 (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X). Raw compute: 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M295X) vs 4.096 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M295X | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,150 | 5,248+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.961 TFLOPS | 4.096 TFLOPS+38% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128 | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 M295X | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 M295X comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X has 3 GB. The Radeon R9 M295X offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 176 GB/s (Radeon R9 M295X) vs 264 GB/s (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X) — a 50% advantage for the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon R9 M295X) vs 768 KB (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X) — the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M295X | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+33% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 176 GB/s | 264 GB/s+50% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Radeon R9 M295X) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 6.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M295X | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_1) |
| Max Displays | 0 | 6 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 M295X) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD 3.2.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M295X | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.0 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | UVD 3.2 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M295X draws 250W versus the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X's 200W — a 22.2% difference. The Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M295X) vs 500W (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X). Power connectors: Mobile vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 275mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M295X | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 200W-20% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 1mm | 275mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80 C |
| Perf/Watt | 20.6 | 26.2+27% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 M295X launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X launched at $299 and now averages $40. The Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X costs 73.3% less ($110 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 34.3 (Radeon R9 M295X) vs 131.2 (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X) — the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X offers 282.5% better value. The Radeon R9 M295X is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M295X | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $299 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $40-73% |
| Performance per Dollar | 34.3 | 131.2+283% |
| Codename | Amethyst | Tahiti |
| Release | November 23 2014 | October 8 2013 |
| Ranking | #437 | #404 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















