Radeon R9 M295X vs FirePro W7100
Radeon R9 M295X
Popular choices:
FirePro W7100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R9 M295X is positioned at rank 273 and the FirePro W7100 is on rank 184, so the FirePro W7100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M295X
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W7100
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 M295X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro W7100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M295X | FirePro W7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro W7100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro W7100 holds the technical lead. Priced at $114 (vs $150), it costs 24% less, resulting in a 29.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M295X | FirePro W7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+29.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($114) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M295X and FirePro W7100
Radeon R9 M295X
The Radeon R9 M295X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 23 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,150 points.
FirePro W7100
The FirePro W7100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 12 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 920 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,065 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 M295X scores 5,150 and the FirePro W7100 reaches 5,065 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M295X is built on GCN 3.0 while the FirePro W7100 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon R9 M295X) vs 1,792 (FirePro W7100). Raw compute: 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M295X) vs 3.297 TFLOPS (FirePro W7100).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M295X | FirePro W7100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,150+2% | 5,065 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+14% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.961 TFLOPS | 3.297 TFLOPS+11% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+14% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+14% | 448 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 M295X | FirePro W7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 M295X comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro W7100 has 8 GB. The FirePro W7100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M295X | FirePro W7100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Radeon R9 M295X) vs 12 (12_0) (FirePro W7100). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M295X | FirePro W7100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_0) |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 M295X) vs VCE 3.0 (FirePro W7100). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD 5.0.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M295X | FirePro W7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.0 | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | UVD 5.0 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M295X draws 250W versus the FirePro W7100's 150W — a 50% difference. The FirePro W7100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M295X) vs 350W (FirePro W7100). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M295X | FirePro W7100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 150W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | 241mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 95 |
| Perf/Watt | 20.6 | 33.8+64% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 M295X launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the FirePro W7100 launched at $799 and now averages $114. The FirePro W7100 costs 24% less ($36 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 34.3 (Radeon R9 M295X) vs 44.4 (FirePro W7100) — the FirePro W7100 offers 29.4% better value.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M295X | FirePro W7100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300-62% | $799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $114-24% |
| Performance per Dollar | 34.3 | 44.4+29% |
| Codename | Amethyst | Tonga |
| Release | November 23 2014 | August 12 2014 |
| Ranking | #437 | #406 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R9 M295X and FirePro W7100
