
CMP 40HX
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5500 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
CMP 40HX
2021Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 5500 XT is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌251.3% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.5 vs 45.6 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Radeon RX 5500 XT
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $500 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 264.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.6 vs 12.5 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
CMP 40HX
2021Radeon RX 5500 XT
2019Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $500 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 264.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.6 vs 12.5 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 5500 XT is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌251.3% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.5 vs 45.6 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 5500 XT better than CMP 40HX?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does CMP 40HX make more sense than Radeon RX 5500 XT?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 58 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 255 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 212 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 27 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 20 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 394 FPS | 409 FPS |
| medium | 315 FPS | 327 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 272 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 204 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 295 FPS | 306 FPS |
| medium | 236 FPS | 245 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 153 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 197 FPS | 204 FPS |
| medium | 157 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 102 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 341 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 273 FPS | 317 FPS |
| high | 241 FPS | 262 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 204 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 306 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 245 FPS |
| high | 183 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 153 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 88 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of CMP 40HX and Radeon RX 5500 XT

CMP 40HX
CMP 40HX
The CMP 40HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1470 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 185W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,749 points. Launch price was $699.

Radeon RX 5500 XT
Radeon RX 5500 XT
The Radeon RX 5500 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 12 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1845 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,080 points. Launch price was $169.
Graphics Performance
The CMP 40HX scores 8,749 and the Radeon RX 5500 XT reaches 9,080 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The CMP 40HX is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 5500 XT uses RDNA 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (CMP 40HX) vs 1,408 (Radeon RX 5500 XT). Raw compute: 7.603 TFLOPS (CMP 40HX) vs 5.196 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5500 XT). Boost clocks: 1650 MHz vs 1845 MHz.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,749 | 9,080+4% |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+64% | 1408 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.603 TFLOPS+46% | 5.196 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1650 MHz | 1845 MHz+12% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 144+64% | 88 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5500 XT is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The CMP 40HX lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The CMP 40HX comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5500 XT has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 5500 XT offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (CMP 40HX) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 5500 XT) — the CMP 40HX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (CMP 40HX) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5500 XT). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (CMP 40HX) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5500 XT). Decoder: No vs VCN 2.0.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | No | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The CMP 40HX draws 185W versus the Radeon RX 5500 XT's 130W — a 34.9% difference. The Radeon RX 5500 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (CMP 40HX) vs 450W (Radeon RX 5500 XT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 180mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 185W | 130W-30% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 450W-10% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 180mm |
| Height | 111mm | 110mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 47.3 | 69.8+48% |
Value Analysis
The CMP 40HX launched at $699 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 5500 XT launched at $199. The Radeon RX 5500 XT costs 71.5% less ($500 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.5 (CMP 40HX) vs 45.6 (Radeon RX 5500 XT) — the Radeon RX 5500 XT offers 264.8% better value. The CMP 40HX is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699 | $199-72% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.5 | 45.6+265% |
| Codename | TU106 | Navi 14 |
| Release | February 25 2021 | December 12 2019 |
| Ranking | #302 | #291 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













