GeForce MX570 A vs Radeon RX 6300M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce MX570 A

2022

Why buy it

✅14.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 25W instead of 35W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 6300M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.

Radeon RX 6300M

2022

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce MX570 A across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 20.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
❌40% higher power demand at 35W vs 25W.

GeForce MX570 A

2022

Radeon RX 6300M

2022

Why buy it

✅14.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 25W instead of 35W, a 10W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 6300M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce MX570 A across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 20.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
❌40% higher power demand at 35W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon RX 6300M better than GeForce MX570 A?

Yes. Radeon RX 6300M is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 3.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 6300M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting better upscaling support with FSR 3 (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and a 6nm process instead of 8nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon RX 6300M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $300 MSRP, and you are getting lower estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 3.4% higher G3D Mark. GeForce MX570 A still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Radeon RX 6300M is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce MX570 A still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.

Is GeForce MX570 A still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. GeForce MX570 A is still a strong gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. This mostly comes down to price. If you want to stay closer to $300 MSRP, it remains a strong choice; if you are comfortable paying more, Radeon RX 6300M earns that extra money with a clearly stronger gaming result and a more complete overall package.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce MX570 A Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 6300M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce MX570 A	Radeon RX 6300M
1080p
low	81 FPS	104 FPS
medium	69 FPS	92 FPS
high	56 FPS	79 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	66 FPS
1440p
low	71 FPS	94 FPS
medium	62 FPS	80 FPS
high	44 FPS	67 FPS
ultra	28 FPS	56 FPS
4K
low	26 FPS	45 FPS
medium	24 FPS	42 FPS
high	16 FPS	31 FPS
ultra	14 FPS	28 FPS

Open GeForce MX570 A Open Radeon RX 6300M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce MX570 A	Radeon RX 6300M
1080p
low	160 FPS	158 FPS
medium	129 FPS	124 FPS
high	99 FPS	92 FPS
ultra	74 FPS	59 FPS
1440p
low	118 FPS	104 FPS
medium	91 FPS	81 FPS
high	71 FPS	60 FPS
ultra	53 FPS	41 FPS
4K
low	68 FPS	53 FPS
medium	54 FPS	41 FPS
high	42 FPS	32 FPS
ultra	29 FPS	20 FPS

Open GeForce MX570 A Open Radeon RX 6300M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce MX570 A	Radeon RX 6300M
1080p
low	279 FPS	289 FPS
medium	223 FPS	231 FPS
high	186 FPS	193 FPS
ultra	140 FPS	144 FPS
1440p
low	210 FPS	217 FPS
medium	168 FPS	173 FPS
high	140 FPS	144 FPS
ultra	105 FPS	108 FPS
4K
low	140 FPS	133 FPS
medium	112 FPS	116 FPS
high	93 FPS	82 FPS
ultra	70 FPS	54 FPS

Open GeForce MX570 A Open Radeon RX 6300M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce MX570 A	Radeon RX 6300M
1080p
low	137 FPS	257 FPS
medium	113 FPS	191 FPS
high	95 FPS	169 FPS
ultra	80 FPS	141 FPS
1440p
low	103 FPS	191 FPS
medium	86 FPS	138 FPS
high	73 FPS	124 FPS
ultra	61 FPS	100 FPS
4K
low	62 FPS	100 FPS
medium	49 FPS	74 FPS
high	39 FPS	64 FPS
ultra	30 FPS	50 FPS

Open GeForce MX570 A Open Radeon RX 6300M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX570 A and Radeon RX 6300M

GeForce MX570 A

The GeForce MX570 A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,208 points.

Radeon RX 6300M

The Radeon RX 6300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,421 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce MX570 A scores 6,208 and the Radeon RX 6300M reaches 6,421 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX570 A is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 6300M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce MX570 A) vs 768 (Radeon RX 6300M). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce MX570 A) vs 3.686 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6300M). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 2400 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (GeForce MX570 A) vs 12 (Radeon RX 6300M) with 64 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce MX570 A	Radeon RX 6300M
G3D Mark Score	6,208	6,421+3%
Architecture	Ampere	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	8 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	2048+167%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.731 TFLOPS+28%	3.686 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1155 MHz	2400 MHz+108%
ROPs	40+25%	32
TMUs	64+33%	48
L1 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	16+33%	12

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6300M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce MX570 A lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce MX570 A gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6300M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce MX570 A	Radeon RX 6300M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR 3
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 96 GB/s (GeForce MX570 A) vs 64 GB/s (Radeon RX 6300M) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce MX570 A. Bus width: 64-bit vs 32-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce MX570 A) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6300M) — the GeForce MX570 A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce MX570 A	Radeon RX 6300M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	96 GB/s+50%	64 GB/s
Bus Width	64-bit+100%	32-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce MX570 A draws 25W versus the Radeon RX 6300M's 35W — a 33.3% difference. The GeForce MX570 A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX570 A) vs 350W (Radeon RX 6300M). Power connectors: Mobile vs Mobile.