
Radeon RX 6300M vs Quadro T1000

Radeon RX 6300M
Popular choices:

Quadro T1000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon RX 6300M is positioned at rank 98 and the Quadro T1000 is on rank 90, so the Quadro T1000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6300M
Performance Per Dollar Quadro T1000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro T1000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 6300M.
| Insight | Radeon RX 6300M | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro T1000 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6300M and Quadro T1000

Radeon RX 6300M
The Radeon RX 6300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,421 points.

Quadro T1000
The Quadro T1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1455 MHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,505 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 6300M scores 6,421 and the Quadro T1000 reaches 6,505 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6300M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Quadro T1000 uses Turing, both on 6 nm vs 12 nm. Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1455 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300M | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,421 | 6,505+1% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz+65% | 1455 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6300M is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro T1000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300M | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 32-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300M | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 32-bit | 256-bit+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6300M) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro T1000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300M | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: Navi 24 Media vs 4th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 6300M) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode (Quadro T1000).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300M | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | — | 5th Gen NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | Navi 24 Media | 4th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 6300M draws 35W versus the Quadro T1000's 50W — a 35.3% difference. The Radeon RX 6300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 6300M) vs 350W (Quadro T1000). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300M | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-30% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 156mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | 65°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 183.5+41% | 130.1 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 6300M is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300M | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $400 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $425 |
| Codename | Navi 24 | TU117 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | May 27 2019 |
| Ranking | #379 | #376 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















