Radeon RX 6300M vs Radeon RX Vega M GH

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon RX 6300M is positioned at rank #98 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6300M

#28

Radeon RX 6650M XT

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

100%

#30

Radeon 8050S

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

95%

#31

Radeon RX 8050S

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

94%

#88

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

254%

#90

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

230%

#91

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

229%

#95

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

209%

#96

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

207%

#98

Radeon RX 6300M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#100

GeForce 945M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $98

99%

#103

Radeon RX 460 (móvel)

MSRP: $99|Avg: $45

97%

#105

GeForce GTX 680M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

96%

#106

Radeon HD 7470M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $12

95%

#110

GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

94%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon RX Vega M GH is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon RX 6300M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Radeon RX 6300M	Radeon RX Vega M GH
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%)	✅Leading raw performance (+2%)
Longevity	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX Vega M GH remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon RX 6300M Benchmark Check

Radeon RX Vega M GH Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6300M and Radeon RX Vega M GH

Radeon RX 6300M

The Radeon RX 6300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,421 points.

Radeon RX Vega M GH

The Radeon RX Vega M GH is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1063 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,548 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon RX 6300M scores 6,421 and the Radeon RX Vega M GH reaches 6,548 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6300M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon RX Vega M GH uses GCN 4.0, both on 6 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon RX 6300M) vs 1,536 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Raw compute: 3.686 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6300M) vs 3.656 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1190 MHz.

Feature	Radeon RX 6300M	Radeon RX Vega M GH
G3D Mark Score	6,421	6,548+2%
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	GCN 4.0
Process Node	6 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	768	1536+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.686 TFLOPS	3.656 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2400 MHz+102%	1190 MHz
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	48	96+100%
L1 Cache	256 KB	384 KB+50%
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6300M is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon RX Vega M GH lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

Feature	Radeon RX 6300M	Radeon RX Vega M GH
Upscaling Tech	FSR 3 (Native)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon RX 6300M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega M GH has 0 MB. The Radeon RX 6300M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 64 GB/s (Radeon RX 6300M) vs 204.8 GB/s (Radeon RX Vega M GH) — a 220% advantage for the Radeon RX Vega M GH. Bus width: 32-bit vs 1024-bit.

Feature	Radeon RX 6300M	Radeon RX Vega M GH
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR6	HBM2
Memory Bandwidth	64 GB/s	204.8 GB/s+220%
Bus Width	32-bit	1024-bit+3100%
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6300M) vs 12_1 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.

Feature	Radeon RX 6300M	Radeon RX Vega M GH
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12_1
Max Displays	3	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Decoder: Navi 24 Media vs UVD 6.3.

Feature	Radeon RX 6300M	Radeon RX Vega M GH
Encoder	—	VCE 3.0
Decoder	Navi 24 Media	UVD 6.3
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX 6300M draws 35W versus the Radeon RX Vega M GH's 100W — a 96.3% difference. The Radeon RX 6300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 6300M) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Power connectors: Mobile vs Integrated.