Radeon RX 6300M vs T600

AMD

Radeon RX 6300M

2022Core: 2000 MHzBoost: 2400 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS

T600

2021Core: 735 MHzBoost: 1335 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon RX 6300M vs T600 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon RX 6300M vs T600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon RX 6300M

2022

Why buy it

  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 32.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $200 MSRP).

T600

2021

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 32.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
  • Radeon RX 6300M is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
T600 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.1% in PassMark G3D (6,425 vs 6,421), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon RX 6300M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer feature stack, with FSR 3 (2023) and FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023), while T600 is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 6nm process instead of 12nm, 12 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2021. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
T600 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, T600 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon RX 6300M has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon RX 6300M vs T600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon RX 6300M

The Radeon RX 6300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,421 points.

NVIDIA

T600

The T600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1335 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,425 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon RX 6300M scores 6,421 and the T600 reaches 6,425 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6300M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the T600 uses Turing, both on 6 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon RX 6300M) vs 640 (T600). Raw compute: 3.686 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6300M) vs 1.709 TFLOPS (T600). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1335 MHz.

FeatureRadeon RX 6300MT600
G3D Mark Score
6,421
6,425
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
Turing
Process Node
6 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
768+20%
640
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.686 TFLOPS+116%
1.709 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2400 MHz+80%
1335 MHz
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
48+20%
40
L1 Cache
256 KB
640 KB+150%
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 6300M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The T600 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

FeatureRadeon RX 6300MT600
Upscaling Tech
FSR 3
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 32-bit on the Radeon RX 6300M and 128-bit on the T600.

FeatureRadeon RX 6300MT600
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
32-bit
128-bit+300%
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6300M) vs 12 (12_1) (T600). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon RX 6300MT600
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12 (12_1)
Vulkan
1.4+8%
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Decoder: Navi 24 Media vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 6300M) vs H.264,HEVC (T600).

FeatureRadeon RX 6300MT600
Encoder
7th Gen NVENC (Turing)
Decoder
Navi 24 Media
5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC
H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX 6300M draws 35W versus the T600's 40W — a 13.3% difference. The Radeon RX 6300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 6300M) vs 350W (T600). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 65°C.

FeatureRadeon RX 6300MT600
TDP
35W-13%
40W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Mobile
PCIe-powered
Length
156mm
Height
69mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
70°C
65°C-7%
Perf/Watt
183.5+14%
160.6
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon RX 6300M (2022 vs 2021).

FeatureRadeon RX 6300MT600
MSRP
$200
Codename
Navi 24
TU117
Release
January 4 2022
May 6 2021
Ranking
#379
#378

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.