P106-100 vs Radeon RX 6300M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

P106-100 vs Radeon RX 6300M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

P106-100 vs Radeon RX 6300M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

P106-100

2017

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 29.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($224 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌114.3% higher power demand at 75W vs 35W.

Radeon RX 6300M

2022

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 35W instead of 75W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 29.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $224 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

P106-100 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.2% in PassMark G3D (6,628 vs 6,421), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 6300M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer feature stack, with FSR 3 (2023) and FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023), while P106-100 is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 6nm process instead of 16nm, 12 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2017. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

P106-100 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, P106-100 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon RX 6300M has the stronger long-term case.

P106-100 vs Radeon RX 6300M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

P106-100

The P106-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 12 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,628 points.

Radeon RX 6300M

The Radeon RX 6300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,421 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The P106-100 scores 6,628 and the Radeon RX 6300M reaches 6,421 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The P106-100 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 6300M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (P106-100) vs 768 (Radeon RX 6300M). Raw compute: 6.655 TFLOPS (P106-100) vs 3.686 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6300M). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 2400 MHz.

Feature	P106-100	Radeon RX 6300M
G3D Mark Score	6,628+3%	6,421
Architecture	Pascal	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	16 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	1920+150%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.655 TFLOPS+81%	3.686 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1733 MHz	2400 MHz+38%
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	120+150%	48
L1 Cache	720 KB+181%	256 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 6300M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The P106-100 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

Feature	P106-100	Radeon RX 6300M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR 3
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the P106-100 and 32-bit on the Radeon RX 6300M. L2 Cache: 2 MB (P106-100) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6300M) — the P106-100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	P106-100	Radeon RX 6300M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit+300%	32-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (P106-100) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6300M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.

Feature	P106-100	Radeon RX 6300M
DirectX	12_1	12 Ultimate
Max Displays	0	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs Navi 24 Media.

Feature	P106-100	Radeon RX 6300M
Encoder	NVENC 6th Gen	—
Decoder	NVDEC 3rd Gen	Navi 24 Media
Codecs	—	H.264,H.265/HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The P106-100 draws 75W versus the Radeon RX 6300M's 35W — a 72.7% difference. The Radeon RX 6300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (P106-100) vs 350W (Radeon RX 6300M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	P106-100	Radeon RX 6300M
TDP	75W	35W-53%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Length	250mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	—	70°C
Perf/Watt	88.4	183.5+108%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon RX 6300M (2022 vs 2017).

Feature	P106-100	Radeon RX 6300M
MSRP	$224	—
Codename	GP104	Navi 24
Release	December 12 2017	January 4 2022
Ranking	#529	#379

Search P106-100 on Amazon

Search Radeon RX 6300M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.