
Quadro T1000 vs Radeon RX 6300M

Quadro T1000
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6300M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro T1000 is positioned at rank 90 and the Radeon RX 6300M is on rank 98, so the Quadro T1000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro T1000
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6300M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro T1000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 6300M.
| Insight | Quadro T1000 | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro T1000 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro T1000 and Radeon RX 6300M

Quadro T1000
The Quadro T1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1455 MHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,505 points.

Radeon RX 6300M
The Radeon RX 6300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,421 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro T1000 scores 6,505 and the Radeon RX 6300M reaches 6,421 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro T1000 is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 6300M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 6 nm. Boost clocks: 1455 MHz vs 2400 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,505+1% | 6,421 |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| Boost Clock | 1455 MHz | 2400 MHz+65% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6300M is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro T1000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 32-bit.
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+700% | 32-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro T1000) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6300M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: 4th Gen NVDEC vs Navi 24 Media. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode (Quadro T1000) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 6300M).
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 5th Gen NVENC (Turing) | — |
| Decoder | 4th Gen NVDEC | Navi 24 Media |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro T1000 draws 50W versus the Radeon RX 6300M's 35W — a 35.3% difference. The Radeon RX 6300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro T1000) vs 350W (Radeon RX 6300M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 35W-30% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 156mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-7% | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 130.1 | 183.5+41% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 6300M is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $400 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $425 | — |
| Codename | TU117 | Navi 24 |
| Release | May 27 2019 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #376 | #379 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











