
Quadro T1000 vs T600

Quadro T1000
Popular choices:

T600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro T1000 is positioned at rank 90 and the T600 is on rank 36, so the T600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro T1000
Performance Per Dollar T600
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro T1000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the T600.
| Insight | Quadro T1000 | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The T600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $180 versus $425 for the Quadro T1000, it costs 58% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 133.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro T1000 | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+133.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($425) | ✅More affordable ($180) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro T1000 and T600

Quadro T1000
The Quadro T1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1455 MHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,505 points.

T600
The T600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1335 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,425 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro T1000 scores 6,505 and the T600 reaches 6,425 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro T1000 is built on Turing while the T600 uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Boost clocks: 1455 MHz vs 1335 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,505+1% | 6,425 |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Boost Clock | 1455 MHz+9% | 1335 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro T1000) vs 12 (12_1) (T600). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 5th Gen NVENC (Turing) (Quadro T1000) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Turing) (T600). Decoder: 4th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode (Quadro T1000) vs H.264,HEVC (T600).
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 5th Gen NVENC (Turing) | 7th Gen NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | 4th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro T1000 draws 50W versus the T600's 40W — a 22.2% difference. The T600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro T1000) vs 350W (T600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 156mm vs 156mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 40W-20% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 156mm | 156mm |
| Height | 69mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | 65°C |
| Perf/Watt | 130.1 | 160.6+23% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro T1000 launched at $400 MSRP and currently averages $425, while the T600 launched at $200 and now averages $180. The T600 costs 57.6% less ($245 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 15.3 (Quadro T1000) vs 35.7 (T600) — the T600 offers 133.3% better value. The T600 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $400 | $200-50% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $425 | $180-58% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.3 | 35.7+133% |
| Codename | TU117 | TU117 |
| Release | May 27 2019 | May 6 2021 |
| Ranking | #376 | #378 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















