Quadro T1000 vs Radeon 780M
Quadro T1000
Popular choices:
Radeon 780M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro T1000 is positioned at rank 90 and the Radeon 780M is on rank 296, so the Quadro T1000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro T1000
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 780M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 780M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro T1000.
| Insight | Quadro T1000 | Radeon 780M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-6.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+6.2%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon 780M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro T1000 and Radeon 780M
Quadro T1000
The Quadro T1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1455 MHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,505 points.
Radeon 780M
The Radeon 780M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,906 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro T1000 scores 6,505 versus the Radeon 780M's 6,906 — the Radeon 780M leads by 6.2%. The Quadro T1000 is built on Turing while the Radeon 780M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 4 nm. Boost clocks: 1455 MHz vs 2900 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | Radeon 780M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,505 | 6,906+6% |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Boost Clock | 1455 MHz | 2900 MHz+99% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | Radeon 780M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs System.
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | Radeon 780M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro T1000) vs 12.2 (Radeon 780M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | Radeon 780M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 5th Gen NVENC (Turing) (Quadro T1000) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon 780M). Decoder: 4th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode (Quadro T1000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 780M).
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | Radeon 780M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 5th Gen NVENC (Turing) | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | 4th Gen NVDEC | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro T1000 draws 50W versus the Radeon 780M's 15W — a 107.7% difference. The Radeon 780M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro T1000) vs 350W (Radeon 780M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 156mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | Radeon 780M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 15W-70% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 156mm | 0mm |
| Height | 69mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 130.1 | 460.4+254% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 780M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2019).
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | Radeon 780M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $400 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $425 | — |
| Codename | TU117 | Phoenix |
| Release | May 27 2019 | January 31 2024 |
| Ranking | #376 | #359 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro T1000 and Radeon 780M
