Quadro T1000 vs Radeon R9 285

NVIDIA

Quadro T1000

2019Core: 1395 MHzBoost: 1455 MHz
Similar parts
·
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 285

2014Core: 918 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro T1000 vs Radeon R9 285 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro T1000 vs Radeon R9 285 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro T1000 vs Radeon R9 285: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro T1000

2019

Why buy it

  • Radeon R9 285 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Quadro T1000 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 50W instead of 190W, a 140W reduction.
  • Measures 156mm instead of 221mm, a 65mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 285 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 60.6% HIGHER MSRP
    $400 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.3 vs 26.8 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Radeon R9 285

2014

Why buy it

  • 17.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $151 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
  • Delivers 65% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.8 vs 16.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 280% higher power demand at 190W vs 50W.
  • 41.7% longer card at 221mm vs 156mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R9 285 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 17.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.7% in PassMark G3D (6,680 vs 6,505), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro T1000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 285 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $151 cheaper on MSRP at $249 vs $400, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 65% (26.8 vs 16.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 285 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro T1000 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro T1000 vs Radeon R9 285 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro T1000

The Quadro T1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1455 MHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,505 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 285

The Radeon R9 285 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 2 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 918 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,680 points. Launch price was $249.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro T1000 scores 6,505 and the Radeon R9 285 reaches 6,680 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro T1000 is built on Turing while the Radeon R9 285 uses GCN 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm.

FeatureQuadro T1000Radeon R9 285
G3D Mark Score
6,505
6,680+3%
Architecture
Turing
GCN 3.0
Process Node
12 nm
28 nm

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro T1000Radeon R9 285
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro T1000 and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 285.

FeatureQuadro T1000Radeon R9 285
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
256-bit
256-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro T1000) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 285). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureQuadro T1000Radeon R9 285
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12.0
Vulkan
1.3+8%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6+5%
4.4
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 5th Gen NVENC (Turing) (Quadro T1000) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 285). Decoder: 4th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 5.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode (Quadro T1000) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Radeon R9 285).

FeatureQuadro T1000Radeon R9 285
Encoder
5th Gen NVENC (Turing)
VCE 3.0
Decoder
4th Gen NVDEC
UVD 5.0
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode
MPEG-2,H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro T1000 draws 50W versus the Radeon R9 285's 190W — a 116.7% difference. The Quadro T1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro T1000) vs 500W (Radeon R9 285). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 156mm vs 221mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 65°C.

FeatureQuadro T1000Radeon R9 285
TDP
50W-74%
190W
Recommended PSU
350W-30%
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
2x 6-pin
Length
156mm
221mm
Height
69mm
109mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
65°C
65°C
Perf/Watt
130.1+270%
35.2
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro T1000 came in at $400, while the Radeon R9 285 launched at $249. On MSRP, Radeon R9 285 was 37.8% cheaper ($151 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 16.3 (Quadro T1000) vs 26.8 (Radeon R9 285) — the Radeon R9 285 offers 64.4% better value. The newer card here is Quadro T1000 (2019 vs 2014).

FeatureQuadro T1000Radeon R9 285
MSRP
$400
$249-38%
Performance per Dollar
16.3
26.8+64%
Codename
TU117
Tonga
Release
May 27 2019
September 2 2014
Ranking
#376
#365

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.