
Quadro T1000

Radeon R9 285
Quadro T1000 vs Radeon R9 285 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro T1000 vs Radeon R9 285 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro T1000 vs Radeon R9 285: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro T1000
2019Why buy it
- ✅Radeon R9 285 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Quadro T1000 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 190W, a 140W reduction.
- ✅Measures 156mm instead of 221mm, a 65mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 285 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌60.6% HIGHER MSRP$400 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.3 vs 26.8 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Radeon R9 285
2014Why buy it
- ✅17.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $151 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 65% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.8 vs 16.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌280% higher power demand at 190W vs 50W.
- ❌41.7% longer card at 221mm vs 156mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro T1000 vs Radeon R9 285 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro T1000
The Quadro T1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1455 MHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,505 points.

Radeon R9 285
The Radeon R9 285 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 2 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 918 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,680 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro T1000 scores 6,505 and the Radeon R9 285 reaches 6,680 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro T1000 is built on Turing while the Radeon R9 285 uses GCN 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm.
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,505 | 6,680+3% |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro T1000 and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 285.
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro T1000) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 285). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+5% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 5th Gen NVENC (Turing) (Quadro T1000) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 285). Decoder: 4th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 5.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode (Quadro T1000) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Radeon R9 285).
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 5th Gen NVENC (Turing) | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | 4th Gen NVDEC | UVD 5.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode | MPEG-2,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro T1000 draws 50W versus the Radeon R9 285's 190W — a 116.7% difference. The Quadro T1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro T1000) vs 500W (Radeon R9 285). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 156mm vs 221mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-74% | 190W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 156mm | 221mm |
| Height | 69mm | 109mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | 65°C |
| Perf/Watt | 130.1+270% | 35.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro T1000 came in at $400, while the Radeon R9 285 launched at $249. On MSRP, Radeon R9 285 was 37.8% cheaper ($151 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 16.3 (Quadro T1000) vs 26.8 (Radeon R9 285) — the Radeon R9 285 offers 64.4% better value. The newer card here is Quadro T1000 (2019 vs 2014).
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $400 | $249-38% |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.3 | 26.8+64% |
| Codename | TU117 | Tonga |
| Release | May 27 2019 | September 2 2014 |
| Ranking | #376 | #365 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














