Quadro T1000 vs Radeon Pro WX 7130

NVIDIA

Quadro T1000

2019Core: 1395 MHzBoost: 1455 MHz
Similar parts
·
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro WX 7130

2016Core: 1188 MHzBoost: 1243 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro T1000 vs Radeon Pro WX 7130 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro T1000 vs Radeon Pro WX 7130 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro T1000 vs Radeon Pro WX 7130: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro T1000

2019

Why buy it

  • Costs $600 less on MSRP ($400 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
  • Delivers 153.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.3 vs 6.4 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
  • Radeon Pro WX 7130 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Quadro T1000 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 50W instead of 130W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 7130 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Radeon Pro WX 7130

2016

Why buy it

  • 53.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 150% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,000 MSRPvs$400 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.4 vs 16.3 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
  • 160% higher power demand at 130W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon Pro WX 7130 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 53.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro T1000 instead at 6,505 vs 6,406, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro T1000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 14nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2016. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro T1000 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $600 cheaper on MSRP at $400 vs $1,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 153.9% (16.3 vs 6.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon Pro WX 7130 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro T1000 vs Radeon Pro WX 7130 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro T1000

The Quadro T1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1455 MHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,505 points.

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 7130

The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1188 MHz to 1243 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,406 points. Launch price was $799.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro T1000 scores 6,505 and the Radeon Pro WX 7130 reaches 6,406 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro T1000 is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro WX 7130 uses GCN 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Boost clocks: 1455 MHz vs 1243 MHz.

FeatureQuadro T1000Radeon Pro WX 7130
G3D Mark Score
6,505+2%
6,406
Architecture
Turing
GCN 4.0
Process Node
12 nm
14 nm
Boost Clock
1455 MHz+17%
1243 MHz

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro T1000Radeon Pro WX 7130
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro T1000 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 7130 carries 8 GB. Radeon Pro WX 7130 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro T1000 and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 7130.

FeatureQuadro T1000Radeon Pro WX 7130
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
8 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro T1000) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureQuadro T1000Radeon Pro WX 7130
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (12_0)
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 5th Gen NVENC (Turing) (Quadro T1000) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Decoder: 4th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode (Quadro T1000) vs H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 7130).

FeatureQuadro T1000Radeon Pro WX 7130
Encoder
5th Gen NVENC (Turing)
VCE 3.4
Decoder
4th Gen NVDEC
UVD 6.3
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode
H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro T1000 draws 50W versus the Radeon Pro WX 7130's 130W — a 88.9% difference. The Quadro T1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro T1000) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 85°C.

FeatureQuadro T1000Radeon Pro WX 7130
TDP
50W-62%
130W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
156mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
65°C-24%
85°C
Perf/Watt
130.1+164%
49.3
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro T1000 came in at $400, while the Radeon Pro WX 7130 launched at $1000. On MSRP, Quadro T1000 was 60% cheaper ($600 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 16.3 (Quadro T1000) vs 6.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7130) — the Quadro T1000 offers 154.7% better value. The newer card here is Quadro T1000 (2019 vs 2016).

FeatureQuadro T1000Radeon Pro WX 7130
MSRP
$400-60%
$1000
Performance per Dollar
16.3+155%
6.4
Codename
TU117
Ellesmere
Release
May 27 2019
November 10 2016
Ranking
#376
#331

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.