
Quadro T1000

Radeon Pro WX 7130
Quadro T1000 vs Radeon Pro WX 7130 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro T1000 vs Radeon Pro WX 7130 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro T1000 vs Radeon Pro WX 7130: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro T1000
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $600 less on MSRP ($400 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 153.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.3 vs 6.4 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Radeon Pro WX 7130 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Quadro T1000 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 130W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 7130 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
Radeon Pro WX 7130
2016Why buy it
- ✅53.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌150% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$400 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.4 vs 16.3 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ❌160% higher power demand at 130W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro T1000 vs Radeon Pro WX 7130 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro T1000
The Quadro T1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1455 MHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,505 points.

Radeon Pro WX 7130
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1188 MHz to 1243 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,406 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro T1000 scores 6,505 and the Radeon Pro WX 7130 reaches 6,406 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro T1000 is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro WX 7130 uses GCN 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Boost clocks: 1455 MHz vs 1243 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,505+2% | 6,406 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Boost Clock | 1455 MHz+17% | 1243 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro T1000 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 7130 carries 8 GB. Radeon Pro WX 7130 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro T1000 and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 7130.
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro T1000) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 5th Gen NVENC (Turing) (Quadro T1000) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Decoder: 4th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode (Quadro T1000) vs H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 7130).
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 5th Gen NVENC (Turing) | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | 4th Gen NVDEC | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro T1000 draws 50W versus the Radeon Pro WX 7130's 130W — a 88.9% difference. The Quadro T1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro T1000) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-62% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 156mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-24% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 130.1+164% | 49.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro T1000 came in at $400, while the Radeon Pro WX 7130 launched at $1000. On MSRP, Quadro T1000 was 60% cheaper ($600 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 16.3 (Quadro T1000) vs 6.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7130) — the Quadro T1000 offers 154.7% better value. The newer card here is Quadro T1000 (2019 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $400-60% | $1000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.3+155% | 6.4 |
| Codename | TU117 | Ellesmere |
| Release | May 27 2019 | November 10 2016 |
| Ranking | #376 | #331 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














