
Quadro T1000

Radeon RX Vega M GH
Quadro T1000 vs Radeon RX Vega M GH Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro T1000 vs Radeon RX Vega M GH FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro T1000 vs Radeon RX Vega M GH: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro T1000
2019Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Radeon RX Vega M GH is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro T1000 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX Vega M GH across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌15500% longer card at 156mm vs 1mm.
Radeon RX Vega M GH
2018Why buy it
- ✅16.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 156mm, a 155mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 16.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro T1000 vs Radeon RX Vega M GH Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro T1000
The Quadro T1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1455 MHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,505 points.

Radeon RX Vega M GH
The Radeon RX Vega M GH is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1063 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,548 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro T1000 scores 6,505 and the Radeon RX Vega M GH reaches 6,548 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro T1000 is built on Turing while the Radeon RX Vega M GH uses GCN 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Boost clocks: 1455 MHz vs 1190 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,505 | 6,548 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Boost Clock | 1455 MHz+22% | 1190 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro T1000 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega M GH carries 0 MB. Quadro T1000 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro T1000 and 1024-bit on the Radeon RX Vega M GH.
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 1024-bit+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro T1000) vs 12_1 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 5th Gen NVENC (Turing) (Quadro T1000) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Decoder: 4th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 6.3.
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 5th Gen NVENC (Turing) | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | 4th Gen NVDEC | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro T1000 draws 50W versus the Radeon RX Vega M GH's 100W — a 66.7% difference. The Quadro T1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro T1000) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 156mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-50% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 156mm | 1mm |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 130.1+99% | 65.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro T1000 came in at $400, while the Radeon RX Vega M GH launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon RX Vega M GH was 100+% cheaper ($400 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 16.3 (Quadro T1000) vs Infinity (Radeon RX Vega M GH) — the Radeon RX Vega M GH offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Quadro T1000 (2019 vs 2018).
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $400 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.3 | Infinity |
| Codename | TU117 | Polaris 22 |
| Release | May 27 2019 | February 1 2018 |
| Ranking | #376 | #373 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














