
Radeon Pro WX 7130 vs Radeon RX 6300M

Radeon Pro WX 7130
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6300M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is positioned at rank 183 and the Radeon RX 6300M is on rank 98, so the Radeon RX 6300M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 7130
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6300M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 6300M is significantly newer (2022 vs 2016). The Radeon RX 6300M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 6300M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro WX 7130 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX 6300M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 7130 and Radeon RX 6300M

Radeon Pro WX 7130
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1188 MHz to 1243 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,406 points. Launch price was $799.

Radeon RX 6300M
The Radeon RX 6300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,421 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 scores 6,406 and the Radeon RX 6300M reaches 6,421 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon RX 6300M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 768 (Radeon RX 6300M). Raw compute: 5.728 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 3.686 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6300M). Boost clocks: 1243 MHz vs 2400 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,406 | 6,421 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+200% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.728 TFLOPS+55% | 3.686 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1243 MHz | 2400 MHz+93% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 144+200% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 576 KB+125% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6300M is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6300M has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 32-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6300M) — the Radeon Pro WX 7130 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+300% | 32-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6300M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs Navi 24 Media. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 6300M).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | — |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | Navi 24 Media |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 draws 130W versus the Radeon RX 6300M's 35W — a 115.2% difference. The Radeon RX 6300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 350W (Radeon RX 6300M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 35W-73% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 70°C-18% |
| Perf/Watt | 49.3 | 183.5+272% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 6300M is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1000 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200 | — |
| Codename | Ellesmere | Navi 24 |
| Release | November 10 2016 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #331 | #379 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















