G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro WX 7130 vs Radeon RX 6300M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon Pro WX 7130 vs Radeon RX 6300M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro WX 7130

2016

Why buy it

✅54.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌271.4% higher power demand at 130W vs 35W.

Radeon RX 6300M

2022

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 35W instead of 130W, a 95W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 7130 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Pro WX 7130 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 54.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon RX 6300M instead at 6,421 vs 6,406, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 6300M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: native frame generation with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023), while Radeon Pro WX 7130 has no comparable frame-generation support, a 6nm process instead of 14nm, 12 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2016. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon Pro WX 7130 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon Pro WX 7130 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon RX 6300M has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon Pro WX 7130 vs Radeon RX 6300M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon Pro WX 7130

The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1188 MHz to 1243 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,406 points. Launch price was $799.

Radeon RX 6300M

The Radeon RX 6300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,421 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro WX 7130 scores 6,406 and the Radeon RX 6300M reaches 6,421 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon RX 6300M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 768 (Radeon RX 6300M). Raw compute: 5.728 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 3.686 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6300M). Boost clocks: 1243 MHz vs 2400 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 7130	Radeon RX 6300M
G3D Mark Score	6,406	6,421
Architecture	GCN 4.0	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	14 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	2304+200%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.728 TFLOPS+55%	3.686 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1243 MHz	2400 MHz+93%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	144+200%	48
L1 Cache	576 KB+125%	256 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR 3 + AFMF

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 6300M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 7130	Radeon RX 6300M
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR 3
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro WX 7130 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6300M carries 4 GB. Radeon Pro WX 7130 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 7130 and 32-bit on the Radeon RX 6300M. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6300M) — the Radeon Pro WX 7130 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 7130	Radeon RX 6300M
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit+300%	32-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6300M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 7130	Radeon RX 6300M
DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs Navi 24 Media. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 6300M).

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 7130	Radeon RX 6300M
Encoder	VCE 3.4	—
Decoder	UVD 6.3	Navi 24 Media
Codecs	H.264,HEVC	H.264,H.265/HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro WX 7130 draws 130W versus the Radeon RX 6300M's 35W — a 115.2% difference. The Radeon RX 6300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 350W (Radeon RX 6300M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 7130	Radeon RX 6300M
TDP	130W	35W-73%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	85°C	70°C-18%
Perf/Watt	49.3	183.5+272%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon RX 6300M (2022 vs 2016).

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 7130	Radeon RX 6300M
MSRP	$1000	—
Codename	Ellesmere	Navi 24
Release	November 10 2016	January 4 2022
Ranking	#331	#379

Search Radeon Pro WX 7130 on Amazon

Search Radeon RX 6300M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.