P106-100 vs Radeon Pro WX 7130

P106-100

2017Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz
Similar parts
·
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro WX 7130

2016Core: 1188 MHzBoost: 1243 MHz
Similar parts
·······

P106-100 vs Radeon Pro WX 7130 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

P106-100 vs Radeon Pro WX 7130: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

P106-100

2017

Why buy it

  • Costs $776 less on MSRP ($224 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
  • Delivers 361.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 29.6 vs 6.4 G3D/$ ($224 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
  • Draws 75W instead of 130W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Radeon Pro WX 7130

2016

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
  • More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 346.4% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,000 MSRPvs$224 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.4 vs 29.6 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $224 MSRP).
  • 73.3% higher power demand at 130W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
P106-100 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.5% in PassMark G3D (6,628 vs 6,406), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
P106-100 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2017 generation instead of 2016. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
P106-100 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $776 cheaper on MSRP at $224 vs $1,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 361.9% (29.6 vs 6.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

P106-100 vs Radeon Pro WX 7130 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

P106-100

The P106-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 12 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,628 points.

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 7130

The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1188 MHz to 1243 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,406 points. Launch price was $799.

Graphics Performance

The P106-100 scores 6,628 and the Radeon Pro WX 7130 reaches 6,406 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The P106-100 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro WX 7130 uses GCN 4.0, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (P106-100) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Raw compute: 6.655 TFLOPS (P106-100) vs 5.728 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1243 MHz.

FeatureP106-100Radeon Pro WX 7130
G3D Mark Score
6,628+3%
6,406
Architecture
Pascal
GCN 4.0
Process Node
16 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
1920
2304+20%
Compute (TFLOPS)
6.655 TFLOPS+16%
5.728 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1733 MHz+39%
1243 MHz
ROPs
64+100%
32
TMUs
120
144+20%
L1 Cache
720 KB+25%
576 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureP106-100Radeon Pro WX 7130
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The P106-100 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 7130 carries 8 GB. Radeon Pro WX 7130 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the P106-100 and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 7130.

FeatureP106-100Radeon Pro WX 7130
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
8 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (P106-100) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

FeatureP106-100Radeon Pro WX 7130
DirectX
12_1
12 (12_0)
Max Displays
0
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (P106-100) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs UVD 6.3.

FeatureP106-100Radeon Pro WX 7130
Encoder
NVENC 6th Gen
VCE 3.4
Decoder
NVDEC 3rd Gen
UVD 6.3
Codecs
H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The P106-100 draws 75W versus the Radeon Pro WX 7130's 130W — a 53.7% difference. The P106-100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (P106-100) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureP106-100Radeon Pro WX 7130
TDP
75W-42%
130W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
250mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
88.4+79%
49.3
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the P106-100 came in at $224, while the Radeon Pro WX 7130 launched at $1000. On MSRP, P106-100 was 77.6% cheaper ($776 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 29.6 (P106-100) vs 6.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7130) — the P106-100 offers 362.5% better value. The newer card here is P106-100 (2017 vs 2016).

FeatureP106-100Radeon Pro WX 7130
MSRP
$224-78%
$1000
Performance per Dollar
29.6+363%
6.4
Codename
GP104
Ellesmere
Release
December 12 2017
November 10 2016
Ranking
#529
#331

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.