CPU
GPU
GRID P40-3Q
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro WX 7130
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID P40-3Q is positioned at rank 341 and the Radeon Pro WX 7130 is on rank 183, so the Radeon Pro WX 7130 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID P40-3Q
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 7130
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID P40-3Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro WX 7130 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GRID P40-3Q | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon Pro WX 7130 holds the technical lead. Priced at $200 (vs $5,699), it costs 96% less, resulting in a 2678.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID P40-3Q | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2678.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($5,699) | ✅More affordable ($200) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID P40-3Q and Radeon Pro WX 7130
GRID P40-3Q
The GRID P40-3Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,570 points. Launch price was $469.
Radeon Pro WX 7130
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1188 MHz to 1243 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,406 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P40-3Q scores 6,570 and the Radeon Pro WX 7130 reaches 6,406 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P40-3Q is built on Kepler while the Radeon Pro WX 7130 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID P40-3Q) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID P40-3Q) vs 5.728 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 7130).
| Feature | GRID P40-3Q | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,570+3% | 6,406 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 2304+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.289 TFLOPS | 5.728 TFLOPS+150% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128 | 144+13% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 576 KB+350% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID P40-3Q | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID P40-3Q comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 7130 has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GRID P40-3Q) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro WX 7130) — the Radeon Pro WX 7130 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID P40-3Q | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GRID P40-3Q) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GRID P40-3Q | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Tesla NVENC x24 (GRID P40-3Q) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Decoder: Tesla NVDEC vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (GRID P40-3Q) vs H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 7130).
| Feature | GRID P40-3Q | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Tesla NVENC x24 | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | Tesla NVDEC | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P40-3Q draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro WX 7130's 130W — a 53.5% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P40-3Q) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GRID P40-3Q | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 130W-42% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 29.2 | 49.3+69% |
Value Analysis
The GRID P40-3Q launched at $5699 MSRP and currently averages $5699, while the Radeon Pro WX 7130 launched at $1000 and now averages $200. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 costs 96.5% less ($5499 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.2 (GRID P40-3Q) vs 32.0 (Radeon Pro WX 7130) — the Radeon Pro WX 7130 offers 2566.7% better value. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).
| Feature | GRID P40-3Q | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5699 | $1000-82% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $5699 | $200-96% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.2 | 32.0+2567% |
| Codename | GK104 | Ellesmere |
| Release | June 28 2013 | November 10 2016 |
| Ranking | #628 | #331 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID P40-3Q and Radeon Pro WX 7130
