
Radeon Pro WX 7130 vs Radeon RX Vega M GH

Radeon Pro WX 7130
Popular choices:

Radeon RX Vega M GH
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is positioned at rank #183 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 7130
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX Vega M GH uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX Vega M GH likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX Vega M GH is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro WX 7130 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX Vega M GH remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 7130 and Radeon RX Vega M GH

Radeon Pro WX 7130
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1188 MHz to 1243 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,406 points. Launch price was $799.

Radeon RX Vega M GH
The Radeon RX Vega M GH is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1063 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,548 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 scores 6,406 and the Radeon RX Vega M GH reaches 6,548 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon RX Vega M GH uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 1,536 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Raw compute: 5.728 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 3.656 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Boost clocks: 1243 MHz vs 1190 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,406 | 6,548+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+50% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.728 TFLOPS+57% | 3.656 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1243 MHz+4% | 1190 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 144+50% | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 576 KB+50% | 384 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega M GH has 0 MB. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 1024-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX Vega M GH) — the Radeon Pro WX 7130 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 1024-bit+700% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 12_1 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs UVD 6.3.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 draws 130W versus the Radeon RX Vega M GH's 100W — a 26.1% difference. The Radeon RX Vega M GH is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 100W-23% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 49.3 | 65.5+33% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 launched at $1000 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the Radeon RX Vega M GH launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Radeon RX Vega M GH costs 100+% less ($200 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 32.0 (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs Infinity (Radeon RX Vega M GH) — the Radeon RX Vega M GH offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon RX Vega M GH is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1000 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 32.0 | Infinity |
| Codename | Ellesmere | Polaris 22 |
| Release | November 10 2016 | February 1 2018 |
| Ranking | #331 | #373 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















