
Radeon Pro WX 7130 vs T600

Radeon Pro WX 7130
Popular choices:

T600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is positioned at rank 183 and the T600 is on rank 36, so the T600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 7130
Performance Per Dollar T600
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The T600 uses modern memory architecture. The T600 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The T600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro WX 7130 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The T600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $180 versus $200 for the Radeon Pro WX 7130, it costs 10% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 11.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+11.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) | ✅More affordable ($180) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 7130 and T600

Radeon Pro WX 7130
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1188 MHz to 1243 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,406 points. Launch price was $799.

T600
The T600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1335 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,425 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 scores 6,406 and the T600 reaches 6,425 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is built on GCN 4.0 while the T600 uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 640 (T600). Raw compute: 5.728 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 1.709 TFLOPS (T600). Boost clocks: 1243 MHz vs 1335 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,406 | 6,425 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+260% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.728 TFLOPS+235% | 1.709 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1243 MHz | 1335 MHz+7% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 144+260% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 576 KB | 640 KB+11% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the T600 has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 1 MB (T600) — the Radeon Pro WX 7130 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 12 (12_1) (T600). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Turing) (T600). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs H.264,HEVC (T600).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | 7th Gen NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 draws 130W versus the T600's 40W — a 105.9% difference. The T600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 350W (T600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 40W-69% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 156mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 65°C-24% |
| Perf/Watt | 49.3 | 160.6+226% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 launched at $1000 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the T600 launched at $200 and now averages $180. The T600 costs 10% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 32.0 (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 35.7 (T600) — the T600 offers 11.6% better value. The T600 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1000 | $200-80% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200 | $180-10% |
| Performance per Dollar | 32.0 | 35.7+12% |
| Codename | Ellesmere | TU117 |
| Release | November 10 2016 | May 6 2021 |
| Ranking | #331 | #378 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















