Radeon Pro WX 7130 vs T600

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 7130

2016Core: 1188 MHzBoost: 1243 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS

T600

2021Core: 735 MHzBoost: 1335 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon Pro WX 7130 vs T600 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro WX 7130 vs T600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro WX 7130

2016

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 400% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,000 MSRPvs$200 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.4 vs 32.1 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
  • 225% higher power demand at 130W vs 40W.

T600

2021

Why buy it

  • Costs $800 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
  • Delivers 401.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 32.1 vs 6.4 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
  • Better long-term bet: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 40W instead of 130W, a 90W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
T600 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.3% in PassMark G3D (6,425 vs 6,406), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
T600 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 14nm and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2016. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
T600 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $800 cheaper on MSRP at $200 vs $1,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 401.5% (32.1 vs 6.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon Pro WX 7130 vs T600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 7130

The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1188 MHz to 1243 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,406 points. Launch price was $799.

NVIDIA

T600

The T600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1335 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,425 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro WX 7130 scores 6,406 and the T600 reaches 6,425 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is built on GCN 4.0 while the T600 uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 640 (T600). Raw compute: 5.728 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 1.709 TFLOPS (T600). Boost clocks: 1243 MHz vs 1335 MHz.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 7130T600
G3D Mark Score
6,406
6,425
Architecture
GCN 4.0
Turing
Process Node
14 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
2304+260%
640
Compute (TFLOPS)
5.728 TFLOPS+235%
1.709 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1243 MHz
1335 MHz+7%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
144+260%
40
L1 Cache
576 KB
640 KB+11%
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 7130T600
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro WX 7130 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the T600 carries 4 GB. Radeon Pro WX 7130 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 7130 and 128-bit on the T600. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 1 MB (T600) — the Radeon Pro WX 7130 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 7130T600
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+100%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 12 (12_1) (T600). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 7130T600
DirectX
12 (12_0)
12 (12_1)
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Turing) (T600). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs H.264,HEVC (T600).

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 7130T600
Encoder
VCE 3.4
7th Gen NVENC (Turing)
Decoder
UVD 6.3
5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
H.264,HEVC
H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro WX 7130 draws 130W versus the T600's 40W — a 105.9% difference. The T600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 350W (T600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 65°C.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 7130T600
TDP
130W
40W-69%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
156mm
Height
69mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
85°C
65°C-24%
Perf/Watt
49.3
160.6+226%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon Pro WX 7130 came in at $1000, while the T600 launched at $200. On MSRP, T600 was 80% cheaper ($800 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 32.1 (T600) — the T600 offers 401.6% better value. The newer card here is T600 (2021 vs 2016).

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 7130T600
MSRP
$1000
$200-80%
Performance per Dollar
6.4
32.1+402%
Codename
Ellesmere
TU117
Release
November 10 2016
May 6 2021
Ranking
#331
#378

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.