Radeon RX 6300M vs Quadro M4000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon RX 6300M is positioned at rank 98 and the Quadro M4000 is on rank 159, so the Radeon RX 6300M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6300M

#28

Radeon RX 6650M XT

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

100%

#30

Radeon 8050S

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

95%

#31

Radeon RX 8050S

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

94%

#88

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

254%

#90

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

230%

#91

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

229%

#95

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

209%

#96

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

207%

#98

Radeon RX 6300M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#100

GeForce 945M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $98

99%

#103

Radeon RX 460 (móvel)

MSRP: $99|Avg: $45

97%

#105

GeForce GTX 680M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

96%

#106

Radeon HD 7470M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $12

95%

#110

GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

94%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro M4000

#74

RTX 5000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $4000|Avg: $4095

90%

#75

Radeon Pro Vega II

MSRP: $2199|Avg: $1800

84%

#76

Radeon PRO W7900

MSRP: $3999|Avg: $3500

84%

#77

Radeon Pro VII

MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1400

83%

#144

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

1750%

#159

Quadro M4000

MSRP: $791|Avg: $350

100%

#160

FirePro W4100

MSRP: $183|Avg: $183

97%

#166

FirePro W5100

MSRP: $399|Avg: $50

89%

#167

Radeon Pro WX 4170

MSRP: $400|Avg: $120

85%

#168

FirePro W4300

MSRP: $379|Avg: $50

85%

#169

Quadro K2200

MSRP: $500|Avg: $40

85%

#173

Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600

MSRP: $119|Avg: $86

83%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon RX 6300M is significantly newer (2022 vs 2015). The Radeon RX 6300M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro M4000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro M4000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 6300M.

Insight	Radeon RX 6300M	Quadro M4000
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-4%)	✅Leading raw performance (+4%)
Longevity	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro M4000 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon RX 6300M Benchmark Check

Quadro M4000 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6300M and Quadro M4000

Radeon RX 6300M

The Radeon RX 6300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,421 points.

Quadro M4000

The Quadro M4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1013 MHz. It has 1,280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,679 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon RX 6300M scores 6,421 and the Quadro M4000 reaches 6,679 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6300M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Quadro M4000 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon RX 6300M) vs 1 (Quadro M4000). Raw compute: 3.686 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6300M) vs 2.496 TFLOPS (Quadro M4000). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1013 MHz.

Feature	Radeon RX 6300M	Quadro M4000
G3D Mark Score	6,421	6,679+4%
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	6 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	768	1,280+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.686 TFLOPS+48%	2.496 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2400 MHz+137%	1013 MHz
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	48	80+67%
L1 Cache	256 KB	480 KB+88%
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6300M is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro M4000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

Feature	Radeon RX 6300M	Quadro M4000
Upscaling Tech	FSR 3 (Native)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon RX 6300M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M4000 has 8 GB. The Quadro M4000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 64 GB/s (Radeon RX 6300M) vs 211 GB/s (Quadro M4000) — a 229.7% advantage for the Quadro M4000. Bus width: 32-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon RX 6300M) vs 2 MB (Quadro M4000) — the Quadro M4000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon RX 6300M	Quadro M4000
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	64 GB/s	211 GB/s+230%
Bus Width	32-bit	256-bit+700%
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6300M) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro M4000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon RX 6300M	Quadro M4000
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.4	1.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Decoder: Navi 24 Media vs 1st Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 6300M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Quadro M4000).

Feature	Radeon RX 6300M	Quadro M4000
Encoder	—	5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell)
Decoder	Navi 24 Media	1st Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX 6300M draws 35W versus the Quadro M4000's 100W — a 96.3% difference. The Radeon RX 6300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 6300M) vs 350W (Quadro M4000). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 82°C.

Feature	Radeon RX 6300M	Quadro M4000
TDP	35W-65%	100W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Mobile	PCIe-powered
Length	—	241mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	70°C-15%	82°C
Perf/Watt	183.5+175%	66.8