Radeon RX 6300M vs Radeon Pro WX 7130

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon RX 6300M is positioned at rank 98 and the Radeon Pro WX 7130 is on rank 183, so the Radeon RX 6300M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6300M

#28

Radeon RX 6650M XT

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

100%

#30

Radeon 8050S

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

95%

#31

Radeon RX 8050S

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

94%

#88

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

254%

#90

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

230%

#91

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

229%

#95

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

209%

#96

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

207%

#98

Radeon RX 6300M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#100

GeForce 945M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $98

99%

#103

Radeon RX 460 (móvel)

MSRP: $99|Avg: $45

97%

#105

GeForce GTX 680M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

96%

#106

Radeon HD 7470M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $12

95%

#110

GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

94%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 7130

#81

Tesla T10

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $975

98%

#82

RTX A5000

MSRP: $3721|Avg: $1800

96%

#83

Radeon Pro Vega 64X

MSRP: $2200|Avg: $2200

95%

#84

Radeon PRO V710

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $2000

94%

#85

RTX A5500

MSRP: $3600|Avg: $2200

91%

#86

Radeon Pro WX 9100

MSRP: $2199|Avg: $550

87%

#168

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

2305%

#183

Radeon Pro WX 7130

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $200

100%

#184

FirePro W7100

MSRP: $799|Avg: $114

99%

#185

P106-090

MSRP: $389|Avg: $30

99%

#186

Radeon Pro WX 4130

MSRP: $300|Avg: $100

98%

#188

Tesla M6

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $84

97%

#190

CMP 30HX

MSRP: $799|Avg: $60

95%

#191

FirePro W2100

MSRP: $139|Avg: $30

95%

#193

FirePro M6000

MSRP: $300|Avg: $50

95%

#196

FirePro M4170

MSRP: $200|Avg: $80

91%

#197

GRID K140Q

MSRP: $125|Avg: $500

91%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon RX 6300M is significantly newer (2022 vs 2016). The Radeon RX 6300M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon RX 6300M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro WX 7130 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Radeon RX 6300M	Radeon Pro WX 7130
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%)
Longevity	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX 6300M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon RX 6300M Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro WX 7130 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

No prediction data available

Valorant

No prediction data available

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6300M and Radeon Pro WX 7130

Radeon RX 6300M

The Radeon RX 6300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,421 points.

Radeon Pro WX 7130

The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1188 MHz to 1243 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,406 points. Launch price was $799.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon RX 6300M scores 6,421 and the Radeon Pro WX 7130 reaches 6,406 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6300M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon Pro WX 7130 uses GCN 4.0, both on 6 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon RX 6300M) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Raw compute: 3.686 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6300M) vs 5.728 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1243 MHz.

Feature	Radeon RX 6300M	Radeon Pro WX 7130
G3D Mark Score	6,421	6,406
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	GCN 4.0
Process Node	6 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	768	2304+200%
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.686 TFLOPS	5.728 TFLOPS+55%
Boost Clock	2400 MHz+93%	1243 MHz
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	48	144+200%
L1 Cache	256 KB	576 KB+125%
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6300M is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

Feature	Radeon RX 6300M	Radeon Pro WX 7130
Upscaling Tech	FSR 3 (Native)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon RX 6300M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 7130 has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 32-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon RX 6300M) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro WX 7130) — the Radeon Pro WX 7130 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon RX 6300M	Radeon Pro WX 7130
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	32-bit	128-bit+300%
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6300M) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon RX 6300M	Radeon Pro WX 7130
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 (12_0)
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Decoder: Navi 24 Media vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 6300M) vs H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 7130).

Feature	Radeon RX 6300M	Radeon Pro WX 7130
Encoder	—	VCE 3.4
Decoder	Navi 24 Media	UVD 6.3
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC	H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX 6300M draws 35W versus the Radeon Pro WX 7130's 130W — a 115.2% difference. The Radeon RX 6300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 6300M) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.