Radeon RX 6300M vs GeForce RTX 4060
Radeon RX 6300M
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon RX 6300M is positioned at rank #98 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6300M
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 204.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 6300M.
| Insight | Radeon RX 6300M | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-204.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+204.4%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 4060 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6300M and GeForce RTX 4060
Radeon RX 6300M
The Radeon RX 6300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,421 points.
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX 6300M scores 6,421 versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 19,548 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 204.4%. The Radeon RX 6300M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 4060 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 6 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon RX 6300M) vs 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060). Raw compute: 3.686 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6300M) vs 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 2460 MHz. Ray tracing: 12 RT cores (Radeon RX 6300M) vs 24 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 96.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300M | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,421 | 19,548+204% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 3072+300% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.686 TFLOPS | 15.11 TFLOPS+310% |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz | 2460 MHz+3% |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 48 | 96+100% |
| L1 Cache | 0.25 MB | 3 MB+1100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 24 MB+2300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 12 | 24+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support modern Frame Generation technology, allowing them to insert intermediate frames to smoothen motion and boost perceived FPS in supported games.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300M | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 6300M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 64 GB/s (Radeon RX 6300M) vs 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) — a 325% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060. Bus width: 32-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon RX 6300M) vs 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300M | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 272 GB/s+325% |
| Bus Width | 32-bit | 128-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 24 MB+2300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6300M) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300M | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: Navi 24 Media vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 6300M) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300M | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | — | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | Navi 24 Media | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 6300M draws 35W versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 115W — a 106.7% difference. The Radeon RX 6300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 6300M) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060). Power connectors: Mobile vs 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 73°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300M | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-70% | 115W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 240mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-4% | 73°C |
| Perf/Watt | 183.5+8% | 170.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300M | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $299 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $299 |
| Codename | Navi 24 | AD107 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #379 | #84 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 6300M and GeForce RTX 4060
