
Radeon RX 6750 XT vs Radeon PRO W6800

Radeon RX 6750 XT
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W6800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6750 XT
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W6800
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 6750 XT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon PRO W6800 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon RX 6750 XT | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) / 7nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 / 7nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (32 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 6750 XT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $320 versus $2,249 for the Radeon PRO W6800, it costs 86% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 617.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 6750 XT | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+617.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($320) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($2,249) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6750 XT and Radeon PRO W6800

Radeon RX 6750 XT
The Radeon RX 6750 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 3 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2150 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,686 points. Launch price was $549.

Radeon PRO W6800
The Radeon PRO W6800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2075 MHz to 2320 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,270 points. Launch price was $2,249.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 6750 XT scores 20,686 and the Radeon PRO W6800 reaches 20,270 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6750 XT is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon PRO W6800 uses RDNA 2.0, both on a 7 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs 3,840 (Radeon PRO W6800). Raw compute: 13.31 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs 17.82 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6800). Boost clocks: 2600 MHz vs 2320 MHz. Ray tracing: 40 RT cores (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs 60 (Radeon PRO W6800).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6750 XT | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,686+2% | 20,270 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 3840+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 13.31 TFLOPS | 17.82 TFLOPS+34% |
| Boost Clock | 2600 MHz+12% | 2320 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 160 | 240+50% |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 40 | 60+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6750 XT is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W6800 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6750 XT | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 6750 XT comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6800 has 32 GB. The Radeon PRO W6800 offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 432 GB/s (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs 576 GB/s (Radeon PRO W6800) — a 33.3% advantage for the Radeon PRO W6800. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs 4 MB (Radeon PRO W6800) — the Radeon PRO W6800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6750 XT | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 32 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 432 GB/s | 576 GB/s+33% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6800). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6750 XT | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6800). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only),VP9 (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon PRO W6800).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6750 XT | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only),VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 6750 XT draws 250W versus the Radeon PRO W6800's 250W — a 0% difference. The Radeon PRO W6800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs 650W (Radeon PRO W6800). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6750 XT | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 82.7+2% | 81.1 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 6750 XT launched at $549 MSRP and currently averages $320, while the Radeon PRO W6800 launched at $2249 and now averages $2249. The Radeon RX 6750 XT costs 85.8% less ($1929 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 64.6 (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs 9.0 (Radeon PRO W6800) — the Radeon RX 6750 XT offers 617.8% better value. The Radeon RX 6750 XT is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2021).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6750 XT | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549-76% | $2249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $320-86% | $2249 |
| Performance per Dollar | 64.6+618% | 9.0 |
| Codename | Navi 22 | Navi 21 |
| Release | March 3 2022 | June 8 2021 |
| Ranking | #70 | #74 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














