
Radeon RX Vega M GL vs GeForce GTX 780M

Radeon RX Vega M GL
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 780M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon RX Vega M GL is positioned at rank 208 and the GeForce GTX 780M is on rank 212, so the Radeon RX Vega M GL offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX Vega M GL
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 780M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX Vega M GL uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX Vega M GL likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 780M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX Vega M GL is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 780M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon RX Vega M GL | GeForce GTX 780M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 780M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $60 versus $150 for the Radeon RX Vega M GL, it costs 60% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 146.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX Vega M GL | GeForce GTX 780M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+146.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX Vega M GL and GeForce GTX 780M

Radeon RX Vega M GL
The Radeon RX Vega M GL is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 931 MHz to 1011 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,906 points.

GeForce GTX 780M
The GeForce GTX 780M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 11 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 823 MHz to 797 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,845 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX Vega M GL scores 3,906 and the GeForce GTX 780M reaches 3,845 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX Vega M GL is built on GCN 4.0 while the GeForce GTX 780M uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon RX Vega M GL) vs 1,536 (GeForce GTX 780M). Raw compute: 2.588 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega M GL) vs 2.448 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780M). Boost clocks: 1011 MHz vs 797 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GL | GeForce GTX 780M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,906+2% | 3,845 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 1536+20% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.588 TFLOPS+6% | 2.448 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1011 MHz+27% | 797 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 128+60% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+150% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GL | GeForce GTX 780M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX Vega M GL comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 780M has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 780M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 179.2 GB/s (Radeon RX Vega M GL) vs 160 GB/s (GeForce GTX 780M) — a 12% advantage for the Radeon RX Vega M GL. Bus width: 1024-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon RX Vega M GL) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780M) — the Radeon RX Vega M GL has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GL | GeForce GTX 780M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s+12% | 160 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 1024-bit+300% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Radeon RX Vega M GL) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 780M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GL | GeForce GTX 780M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon RX Vega M GL) vs 1st Gen NVENC (Kepler) (GeForce GTX 780M). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega M GL) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 780M).
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GL | GeForce GTX 780M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.0 | 1st Gen NVENC (Kepler) |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | PureVideo HD VP5 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX Vega M GL draws 65W versus the GeForce GTX 780M's 122W — a 61% difference. The Radeon RX Vega M GL is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon RX Vega M GL) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 780M). Power connectors: Integrated vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GL | GeForce GTX 780M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W-47% | 122W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 60.1+91% | 31.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 780M costs 60% less ($90 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 26.0 (Radeon RX Vega M GL) vs 64.1 (GeForce GTX 780M) — the GeForce GTX 780M offers 146.5% better value. The Radeon RX Vega M GL is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GL | GeForce GTX 780M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $60-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.0 | 64.1+147% |
| Codename | Polaris 22 | GK104 |
| Release | February 1 2018 | May 11 2013 |
| Ranking | #500 | #511 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















