Radeon RX Vega M GL
VS
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

Radeon RX Vega M GL vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

AMD

Radeon RX Vega M GL

2018Core: 931 MHzBoost: 1011 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023Core: 2310 MHzBoost: 2535 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon RX Vega M GL is positioned at rank #208 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX Vega M GL

#198
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
417%
#200
378%
#201
377%
#205
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
343%
#206
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
340%
#208
Radeon RX Vega M GL
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
100%
#212
GeForce GTX 780M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $60
98%
#216
Radeon 8040S
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
94%
#217
Radeon R7 +8G
MSRP: $49|Avg: $20
93%
#221
Radeon HD 6550A
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
91%
#222
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
110%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
108%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
108%
#15
Radeon RX 6500 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $150
107%
#16
GeForce RTX 3070
MSRP: $499|Avg: $200
106%
#17
Radeon RX 6700
MSRP: $379|Avg: $300
106%
#18
Radeon RX 6600 XT
MSRP: $379|Avg: $170
104%
#19
Radeon RX590 GME
MSRP: $173|Avg: $115
104%
#20
Radeon RX 6650 XT
MSRP: $399|Avg: $230
103%
#21
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti
MSRP: $379|Avg: $379
101%
#22
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
MSRP: $169|Avg: $179
101%
#23
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
MSRP: $249|Avg: $209
101%
#24
Radeon RX 6600 LE
MSRP: $329|Avg: $160
100%
#25
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB
MSRP: $379|Avg: $379
100%
#26
Radeon RX 7700 XT
MSRP: $449|Avg: $380
100%
#27
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $380
100%
#28
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB
MSRP: $269|Avg: $318
99%
#29
Radeon RX 6700 XT
MSRP: $479|Avg: $230
99%
#30
GeForce RTX 3060
MSRP: $329|Avg: $289
99%
#31
Radeon RX 7400
MSRP: $199|Avg: $199
98%
#32
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
98%
#33
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
96%
#34
Radeon RX 5300
MSRP: $129|Avg: $50
94%
#35
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
MSRP: $150|Avg: $77
93%
#36
Radeon RX 6400
MSRP: $159|Avg: $139
93%
#37
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
MSRP: $599|Avg: $330
93%
#38
Arc A750
MSRP: $289|Avg: $229
92%
#39
Radeon RX 6800
MSRP: $579|Avg: $370
91%
#40
GeForce RTX 3060 8GB
MSRP: $329|Avg: $280
91%
#41
Radeon RX 6750 XT
MSRP: $549|Avg: $320
90%
#42
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
MSRP: $799|Avg: $590
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 479.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (8 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX Vega M GL.

InsightRadeon RX Vega M GLGeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-479.9%)
Leading raw performance (+479.9%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $380 (vs $150), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 128.9% better value per dollar than the Radeon RX Vega M GL.

InsightRadeon RX Vega M GLGeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+128.9%)
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($150)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($380)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX Vega M GL and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

AMD

Radeon RX Vega M GL

The Radeon RX Vega M GL is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 931 MHz to 1011 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,906 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX Vega M GL scores 3,906 versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 22,651 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 479.9%. The Radeon RX Vega M GL is built on GCN 4.0 while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 14 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon RX Vega M GL) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Raw compute: 2.588 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega M GL) vs 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Boost clocks: 1011 MHz vs 2535 MHz.

FeatureRadeon RX Vega M GLGeForce RTX 4060 Ti
G3D Mark Score
3,906
22,651+480%
Architecture
GCN 4.0
Ada Lovelace
Process Node
14 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
1280
4352+240%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.588 TFLOPS
22.06 TFLOPS+752%
Boost Clock
1011 MHz
2535 MHz+151%
ROPs
32
48+50%
TMUs
80
136+70%
L1 Cache
0.31 MB
4.3 MB+1287%
L2 Cache
1 MB
32 MB+3100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon RX Vega M GL lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

FeatureRadeon RX Vega M GLGeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
DLSS 3.5
Frame Generation
Not Supported
DLSS 3.0 (Native)
Ray Reconstruction
No
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon RX Vega M GL comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 179.2 GB/s (Radeon RX Vega M GL) vs 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — a 60.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti. Bus width: 1024-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon RX Vega M GL) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon RX Vega M GLGeForce RTX 4060 Ti
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
8 GB
Memory Type
HBM2
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
288 GB/s+61%
Bus Width
1024-bit+700%
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
32 MB+3100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Radeon RX Vega M GL) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon RX Vega M GLGeForce RTX 4060 Ti
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12.2+2%
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
6+50%
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon RX Vega M GL) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega M GL) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti).

FeatureRadeon RX Vega M GLGeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Encoder
VCE 3.0
8th Gen NVENC
Decoder
UVD 6.3
5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX Vega M GL draws 65W versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 160W — a 84.4% difference. The Radeon RX Vega M GL is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon RX Vega M GL) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Power connectors: Integrated vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 240mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 70°C.

FeatureRadeon RX Vega M GLGeForce RTX 4060 Ti
TDP
65W-59%
160W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
550W
Power Connector
Integrated
8-pin
Length
0mm
240mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
80
70°C-13%
Perf/Watt
60.1
141.6+136%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon RX Vega M GL launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 and now averages $380. The Radeon RX Vega M GL costs 60.5% less ($230 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 26.0 (Radeon RX Vega M GL) vs 59.6 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 129.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).

FeatureRadeon RX Vega M GLGeForce RTX 4060 Ti
MSRP
$150-62%
$399
Avg Price (30d)
$150-61%
$380
Performance per Dollar
26.0
59.6+129%
Codename
Polaris 22
AD106
Release
February 1 2018
May 18 2023
Ranking
#500
#59